Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Hinduism/archive1

Hinduism

Ok, I have been doing some major work on this portal recently, I think that it might soon be a good idea to nominate it for WP:FPO. But I need to see what needs to be improved, and I will work on it immediately. Also worth noting, the portal hasn't been maintained for a long while, but now I am starting to change that :) Arjun 21:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Arjun. I think it's a nice portal overall. Here are some thoughts. Rfrisbie^talk 21:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

• Update "Upcoming festivals." Consider creating monthly rotation and relable "Anniversaries". I can set it up if you have the content.
• Include at least 10 items for newly rotated "Selected quote" section.
• Include at least 10 items for each "Selected..." section.
• Add "Topics" section.
• Fix "Associated Wikimedia" section. Picture links go to "Chemistry". Some links are blank but don't have to be.
• Use an automated system to rotate content, either scheduled or randomized.
• Add nominations links for the other selected/archived sections.
• Add "Things you can do" section.
• Be more consistent with typical header layout, e.g., big→"The Hinduism Portal", "WikiProjects" "Did you know..."
• Be more consistent with typical footer layout, e.g., use full-sized text, "Read more..."
• Get rid of the inner "Things you can do" box.

Suggestions from Sd31415 (talk • contribs)

1. In the introduction, Hinduism's classifications (monism, etc.) do not need to be capitalized.

   Done. Rfrisbie^talk 15:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

2. In the selected picture, "Photo credit" instead of just "Credit."

   None of the images are photos. "Credit" is more applicable. Rfrisbie^talk 18:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

   Thanks! —S.D. ¿п? 18:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

3. In my opinion, in the categories, Hinduism (still bold), should be placed next to the others.
4. In the things you can do section, you could use or another icon.
5. Should there be some article next to the Hinduism Peer Review line, since some articles are being peer reviewed?

   Done. Rfrisbie^talk 21:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

6. Why is the portal in chemistry portal category?

   This is a "copy-and-paste" error that still needs fixing. Rfrisbie^talk 18:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

   Yeah all it was was an error that I made from copying the Chemistry WikiMedia, I didn't realize the cat, or the clickthrough images. Arjun 19:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Otherwise, I like the portal a lot! —S.D. ¿п? 17:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)