The licensing information erroneously indicates that this image is PD because everything on Flickr is. To my knowledge, nothing on Flickr is public domain. This particular image is copyrighted. Chaser - T 02:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyright Vio. --Knulclunk 20:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, most of user's uploads are copyvios and this one has contradictory licensing information. No context for encyclopedic use. B 04:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, insufficient context to determine encylopedic use. Most of this user's uploads are copyvios and this one has contradictory licensing information. B 04:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Declined speedy, reason was "unused and not very useful" But|seriously|folks 04:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image was orphaned because someone decided they didn't like it after appearing in an article for over a year. I have restored it to the article. Shoehorn 03:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's an orphan again. What article was the image in? – Quadell(talk) (random) 14:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The image appears in RuneScape skills. The change has been reverted three or four times now. If I place the image on my user page, will that at least prevent the automatic orphan/delete process? Shoehorn 19:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This book cover is used to illustrate an article about the Tirpitz, not about the book. Since there are other illustrations of the Tirpitz, I don't see any reason fair use is needed. — PyTom (talk) 05:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as ineligible for copyright - appears to be derived from published copywritten work, notable from Star Trek: Deep Space Nine TV series. Apparent copyright vio. Ejfetters 16:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
orphan, superseded by Image:Methcathinone skeletal.svg (which, btw, does not have extra and annoying CH3s where they're not normally indicated) Calliopejen1 19:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does not state the name of the photographer (in other words, has insufficient source information), is poor quality because Virtual PC or a similar program could make a non-photographic replacement relatively easily, fails WP:NFCC#8 (signifcance) because it is used to illustrate device drivers in general, not device driver loading during Windows XP safe mode bootup. —Remember the dot(talk) 23:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Decision to use in article should be made in article discussion. As for poor quality, keep until better, Virtual PC image is produced. --Knulclunk 20:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If the list is copyrightable (it's marked as fair use), it is not significant enough. If it is not copyrightable, a screenshot is pretty easy to generate even semi-manually, but its significance is still low. --AVRS 17:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
