August 14

Uploaded by Onetwo1 (notify | contribs). Unused and pointless image Phoenix Hacker 03:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Clay4president (notify | contribs). CV: Image has a large "prosportspictures.com" watermark on it. There is currently no evidence that this is really a {{CopyrightedFreeUse-Link}} image. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by E. Brown (notify | contribs). OR, OB as superseded by commons Image:Unnamed subtropical storm (2005).jpg Nilfanion (talk) 00:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Muesc (notify | contribs). UE; added as a stunt for a page to speedied Daniel Case 02:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Gfrankson (notify | contribs). Obsoleted by free Image:Gulf Islands map.png Circeus 03:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Kwp (notify | contribs). Orphaned JPEG that should be a PNG or SVG. —Bkell (talk) 05:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Kwp (notify | contribs). Orphaned JPEG that should be a PNG or SVG. —Bkell (talk) 05:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Pedriana (notify | contribs). Obsoleted by Image:I-285.svg on Commons. —Scott5114 12:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Gin and Tonic (notify | contribs). OB by commons Image:RCMP and US Infantry outside Canadian Embassy.jpg Nilfanion (talk) 14:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs). Orphaned; copyright free status could not be verified.--Jiang 14:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by LuckyLady (notify | contribs). Unencyclopedic and unused. User:Angr 17:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn. Picture is now being used in an article. User:Angr 07:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The photograph is a free use picture that I personally took and it is in fact being used on the German version of Wikipedia. Not quite sure what the problem with this photograph is. If it is removed now no one will get the chance to use this rights free image. LuckyLady 17:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was unable to be acted upon by en: community, as media is at Wikimedia Commons. See commons:Template:Deletion requests for nominating Commons images for deletion. Jkelly 18:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded by Geogre (notify | contribs). Divisive, non-encyclopaedic. --Ligulem 18:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a WP:POINT action vis a vis Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Administrators open to recall. Keep. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 18:13, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for AGF. I have always found this banner to be divisive. I have tolerated it until now. Since everybody here starts to find everything divisive, I'm now free to express that I find this box extremely divisive. Also the notion of a rouge-admin is highly divisive. Yes, if you find Category:Administrators open to recall divisve, then I find this picture divisive too. And much more harmful than Category:Administrators open to recall. --Ligulem 18:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I must also add that this banner was used by an Italian terrorist organisation, who kidnapped and murdered an italian prime minister. See the picture at Red Brigades. Is this what you want to be affiliated with? There are people in the world that find this offensive. --Ligulem 18:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This EXACT image?? I find the hammer and sickle offensive but have no problem with others using it for things either. ++Lar: t/c 18:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
When I uploaded it and Photoshopped it, I was concerned that Italians might be offended. Had this been based on a complaint that it seemed to glamorize a terrorist group, I would have pleaded "no contest." However, where I got the idea for the image was not from the Red Brigades, but from The Clash, who used it for their records. No matter how revolutionary you think The Clash were, they weren't actually successful in leading The Revolution or killing anyone. Geogre 18:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - As for take this discussion to Commons? maybe maybe not. It's technically the wrong forum here, yes, but this is where the image is used... discussion on Commons might not find the right audience. That said, I am proud to have been awarded this image, it signifies my membership in a category (recently surviving a CfD by the way) of admins who are willing to Do The Right Thing without letting process wonkism stop them. I see no dichotomy with this category and admins open to recall (or else I wouldn't have asked about both on recent RfAs) and am baffled at any connection. ++Lar: t/c 18:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Uploaded by Sidetrackfilms (notify | contribs). No source, no copyright tag, and no fair use rationale. Hbdragon88 18:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Beast47 (notify | contribs). OR, AU, presumably uploaded for a now-deleted article BigDT 23:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by MikeSty (notify | contribs). OR, UE, vanity image used only for vandalism [1] BigDT 23:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jtravis135 (notify | contribs). OR, UE BigDT 23:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jonspotz (notify | contribs). OR, AU, uploader said that these images were for an article on a local councilman [2]. Presumably, this article has been deleted. BigDT 23:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jonspotz (notify | contribs). OR, AU, uploader said that these images were for an article on a local councilman [3]. Presumably, this article has been deleted. BigDT 23:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jonspotz (notify | contribs). OR, AU, uploader said that these images were for an article on a local councilman [4]. Presumably, this article has been deleted. BigDT 23:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jonspotz (notify | contribs). OR, AU, uploader said that these images were for an article on a local councilman [5]. Presumably, this article has been deleted. BigDT 23:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Jonspotz (notify | contribs). OR, AU, uploader said that these images were for an article on a local councilman [6]. Presumably, this article has been deleted. BigDT 23:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by KazuyaMinekura (notify | contribs). OR, UE ... MS Paint gone wild! BigDT 23:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Archos (notify | contribs). OR, WP:NOT a crystal ball BigDT 23:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Heartbreak1980 (notify | contribs). OR, Unused vanity pic. BigDT 23:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Rijaalharat (notify | contribs). OR, advertisement BigDT 23:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Havl (notify | contribs). OR, UE, uploaded for a speedy deleted article BigDT 23:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Genedeitch (notify | contribs). OR, AU, a user-created cartoon. WP:NOT free webhosting. BigDT 23:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not deleted. howcheng {chat} 23:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Basique (notify | contribs). Duplicate of an image I uploaded later. --Basique 23:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded by Goodintentions (notify | contribs). OR, image summary is "Image from the Crimethinc website. I'd be surprised if they care it's here." Well, that's not quite a waiver of copyright. BigDT 23:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]