Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Long Beach, CA at night.jpg

Long Beach, CA at night edit

Long Beach, CA at night

Reason: ~~Way~~ too small and buildings are tilted
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Long_Beach,_CA_at_night
Nominator: Mfield (talk)

Delist — Mfield (talk) 16:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. I agree, and more obviously than the buildings being tilted, all the reflections are subsequently tilted. A fairly ordinary picture by current standards. Very little wow. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 16:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Insufficient detail, and blown hightlights Thisglad (talk) 08:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Diliff. Cacophony (talk) 15:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Small, uninformative, and tilted. NauticaShad es 21:51, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I take issue with nominations that say "way too small" when the picture is actually above the limit set out by the criteria. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 22:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was more of a reference to the 480 height than anything, I will strike the 'way' out, but this is an easily retaken image that has been cropped from the original to improve composition. If it had been shot correctly composed in the first place then it would not have ended up this small. Mfield (talk) 23:04, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You weren't the first one, so don't feel bad or anything. I'll keep reminding other people as well. I've said previously that if people feel the standards have changed, we should change the criteria to reflect this. Cheers. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 15:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delist per nom., Diliff and Nauticashades. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, just doesn't pass the rigors of our current system gren グレン 02:56, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted MER-C 10:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]