Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Yarra Panorama

Yarra Panorama

A panorama of Melbourne's Yarra River by night, showing the Central Business District on the left and the Southbank entertainment district on the right.

Twilight version.

Another Diliff spectacular. At full magnification is ever so slightly less sharp than it perhaps could be (cf. the similar Image:Sydney Harbour Bridge night.jpg), but this seems to me to be of such a minor degree it's hardly an issue. The figures might be a problem. I thought I'd put it up for you experts to decide. Appears in Yarra River, illustrates it very well.

Nominate and support. Both.—enceph alon 02:06, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, like the composition. Phoenix2 03:08, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE. I've just discovered a second Diliff work on the Yarra, this one taken at twilight (looks like late twilight to me): Image:Melbourne yarra twilight.jpg. It looks as good IMHO, and I think both deserve FP noms. When voting, perhaps editors could state their preferences for "Night" and/or "Twilight"; is a separate nom necessary?—enceph alon 07:54, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the twilight image to this page as well. As they have almost identical subjects, I don't think creating a seperate nomination page should be necessary. Raven4x4x 08:47, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, Raven. Nicely done.—enceph alon 00:27, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- both of them are awesome, although I prefer the full night shot myself. TomStar81 03:07, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support both, even though I live in the better city of Australia :) Enochlau 04:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. JediMaster16 09:57, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support both as well. It's great to see some wonderful pictures of Australian cities. Raven4x4x 10:27, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support both but I prefer the twilight version. JoJan 19:24, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support either, but I too prefer the twilight one. --Lord Vold e mort ^{(Dark Mark)|My RfA} 21:54, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
~~Drool~~ Support both - remarkable.--Deglr6328 03:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support only the Twilight one. The light on it just is slightly better. --AllyUnion (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support both images. They both deserve FP credit, despite their similarities. CapeCodEph 06:18, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer the twinlight one. Very impressive picture. Mistikal 07:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both. Marvelous work. EZG 10:44, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support both. --Bash 22:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 03:12, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Either of them; they both look great. --Loopy 04:26, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support the twilight image. I think it's lit better. DO'Иeil 06:42, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both. Twilight version looks better but is at lower res, so I think they're equally worthy. --Fir0002 02:13, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow Nixdorf 21:00, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support both and make Diliff our official Wikimedia photographer! Tito xd^(?!?) 01:48, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Yarra Panorama.jpg Promoted Image:Melbourne yarra twilight.jpg It looks like both of them were popular. Raven4x4x 08:04, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]