Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Trifolium pratense

Trifolium pratense edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2012 at 15:30:42 (UTC)

Original – Trifolium pratense flower

Alternative

Alt 2 - less saturation on original

Reason: Good EV and high quality
Articles in which this image appears: Trifolium pratense
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: 池田正樹

Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 15:30, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support, educational and encyclopedic, good resolution, high quality image. Also, SCIENCE! — Cirt (talk) 19:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose original oversaturated. Samsara (FA • FP) 23:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm not convinced that it's oversaturated. The lighting looks good (possibly off centre flash used) which might be contributing to it being well saturated. If indeed oversaturated, it should be simple enough to desaturate without loss of fidelity as it's not blown in any of the RGB channels. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 11:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An exact duplicate is available with a wrong ID which should be deleted. A cropped version of File:Wiesen-Klee, Trifolium pratense 4.JPG may also worth to consider, which has more details and less noise. Both suffer in DOF to some extend. -- JKadavoor Jee 15:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess the duplicate image is an issue for Commons rather than this process as it's not used in the English Wiki, but thanks for bringing it to our attention. I don't think the alternative that you link to is nearly as nice as this one though, as the frontal flash is not subtle or particularly aesthetic. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 16:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That one doesn't have the oversaturation problem. I've added that as an alt and adjusted the sizes. I hope that's okay, Tomer. Support alt. Samsara (FA • FP) 20:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's ok. Tomer T (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose alt uneven composition, and I don't like the angle of view and the fact that the flower is kind of 'tilted'. Tomer T (talk) 20:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure it's oversaturated, but I uploaded an edit with less saturation and added it as Alt 2. Tomer T (talk) 20:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Julia\^talk 15:52, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]