Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Peron's tree frog

Peron's tree frog edit

Peron's tree frog (Litoria peronii)

New photo

Good representation of Peron's tree frog. This is a very common frog throughout the Australian state of New South Wales. Appears in Peron's tree frog, and was created by liquidGhoul 00:41, 4 December 2005 (UTC).[reply]

Nominate and support. - liquidGhoul 00:41, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
My only complaint on this image is that the reflections in the water distract from the frog, other than that it's a nice photo. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 05:05, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I think the colors are too bland. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:08, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The background is really detracting. --vaeiou 02:39, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I went out frog watching last night, and came across another of this species. This photo gets rid of most of the problems you all have. I didn't want to place another FPC, so I will just put it here as no one has voted yet. --liquidGhoul 12:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I don't really like the new one any better than the older version. --vaeiou 21:11, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. The new one has better colours but flash photography is never that pretty and in the case of the slimy frog, it results in lots of blown out reflections which don't look that great at 100%. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:18, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
( − ) Oppose Agree with Diliff, also the front leg seems in an odd position. --Fir0002 23:26, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per Diliff. Enochlau 01:09, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - agree with the above; I also don't find it that stunning. Flcelloguy (A note?) 17:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - colors ugly, not terribly original angle or composition. - JustinWick 00:54, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:51, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]