Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Papilio Polytes Female

Papilio Polytes Female edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2014 at 19:13:44 (UTC)

 
OriginalPapilio polytes
Reason
Good quality and EV.
Articles in which this image appears
Papilio polytes
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator
Muhammad Mahdi Karim
  • Support, though it is at the lowest allowable resolution. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC) [reply]
  • Oppose, The gravel is in sharper definition than the butterfly. The butterfly itself is damaged. For an artistic shot, this may not matter, but for a very straight image with emphasis on subject matter rather than artistry, the butterfly needs to be intact. Amandajm (talk) 05:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question: Is it acceptable to try and mend a butterfly's wing? nagualdesign (talk) 20:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I rather like it, though I'm not sure how others feel. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Nagualdesign, great! You are a butterfly doc :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. I can doctor anything, me.   nagualdesign (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See previous discussion. :( Jee 03:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But it is a good example for explaining how the fancy tails, antenna like growths and "false eyes" help to confuse the predators and save their lives. They also adapt a behavior to enhance these features. Jee 04:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think that once the broken piece of wing is digitally replaced, it rules it out as a great photo. Amandajm (talk) 05:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 19:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]