Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Nudibranch

Nembrotha cristata edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2013 at 08:04:00 (UTC)

 
Original – Nudibranch (Nembrotha cristata), a shell-less mollusc in the waters of Bunaken National Park, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Bunaken has a very rich coral ecosystem with about 390 species of coral.
Reason
Excellent depiction of the Nembrotha cristata in its natural habitat
Articles in which this image appears
Nembrotha cristata, Bunaken National Park, Nudibranch
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Molluscs
Creator
Chriswan Sungkono
 
Alt 1
  • Support as nominator --ELEKHHT 08:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Is there a reason this one is not used in the infobox? What does the other offer that this doesn't? J Milburn (talk) 16:26, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not really, so I moved it to the infobox. --ELEKHHT 00:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question does it always have that ugly plant growing out of its back? --WingtipvorteX PTT 19:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm pretty sure they're the cerata. They're functionally similar to gills, although with several additional uses. (also, Support both Room for two. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:25, 3 August 2013 (UTC)) Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Well then, odd body part clarified, Support. Thanks Adam. --WingtipvorteX PTT 21:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • I also support the Alt. Either one is good for me, though I do feel the Alt has a bit more EV in regards to the animal itself and the original more EV in regards to the environment. --WingtipvorteX PTT 22:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Fantastic picture of a fantastic creature. 86.160.215.247 (talk) 02:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Original Will be hard to find a better picture of this creature. Mattximus (talk) 03:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose original, support alt I think File:Nembrotha_cristata_2.jpg has less ambiguity about the growths on the creature's back. It also shows the mouth and that the neck may curve up from the abdomen. --Pine 05:52, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I understand why you like the alt, but I don't think that is a reason to oppose the original which shows the nudibranch from a different angle and with a better depiction of its natural habitat (and therefore has considerable EV also in the Bunaken article). Probably the alt could replace the current side-view image in the article. --ELEKHHT 07:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional support original Criteria 7: "descriptive, informative and complete file description in English", please expand description further. – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 06:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Conditions met, thanks for notifying me Armbrust. – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 22:56, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • For what it's worth, I support the ALT... if we can count that. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:43, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm late to the party on this one, but I would support the Alt as well. Rreagan007 (talk) 21:03, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Nembrotha cristata bunaken.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 07:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The alternative didn't have enough support at the end of the voting period. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:55, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I see Adam and Wingtip saying they support both, Pine opposing the original and supporting the alt, and two late !votes which show a preference for the ALT. Elekhh did not mention the alt at all, while the other two only supported the original. Excluding the late !votes, that's Original 5-1, ALT 4-0. Just in case the numbers are unclear. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Just noting that the Alt was only included in the broader article about the genus but not the article about the species, that's why I abstained at this time. I added it now to the species article where I think it fits very well together with the currently promoted image. If it stays stable it might be worth re-nominating as a second FP. --ELEKHHT 06:44, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]