Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Loch Lomond

Loch Lomond edit

 
Loch Lomond in Scotland

Created by Abubakr.h. A stunning view of Loch Lomond which is regarded by many as the most beautiful lake in the world. Appears in the article Loch Lomond.

  • Nominate and support. - Abubakr.h 16:00, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • support. It is a beautiful picture and deserving of being a featured article. Sotakeit 18:40, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. A bit blurry, the lighting isn't that good, and the branches in the foreground are too distracting. - JPM | 18:46, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I completely disagree with JPM about the branches, imho they add to the image. Thryduulf 19:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Agree with JPM - a lower viewpoint could have helped making the branches less dominant. --Mikeo 19:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. "...regarded by many as the most beautiful lake in the world." A pity this photo doesn't convey that feeling - with its murky colors and bare, ugly twigs - sorry, doesn't work for me. --Janke | Talk 20:50, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - You only seem to dislike the image caption. KILO-LIMA 13:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I like it. KILO-LIMA 21:14, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose the lighting on the tree in the right foreground spoils it for me.--Dschwen 21:27, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Dschwen. Pity, because it's such a nice photo apart from this. deeptrivia (talk) 01:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Nice picture, but the lighting does spoil it.--Ali K 05:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Opppose. Too much distracting foreground. Dylan 13:00, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I actually LIKE the photo, but I feel that it doesn't do a good job of depicting the subject. Here's a case where it's simply too "artsy". --Dante Alighieri | Talk 19:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Changing vote to Support. Every time I see it, I like it better, and the others make excellent points. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 01:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I think it captures the mood nicely. chowells 01:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. A rare moment well captured. - Samsara contrib talk 11:53, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I too, like the mood.--Lewk_of_Serthic 02:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I like it.Pschemp | Talk 07:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • ( + ) Support Beautiful shot --Fir0002 07:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I think it's just beautiful СПУТНИКССС Р 22:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Great atmosphere. — Pixel8 23:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I find the branches at the top ruinously distracting: they really steal the focus. And the light on the trunk lets it down too. Good enough for the encyclopedia but not good enough for FP. ~ VeledanTalk 17:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Captures the mood well. The lighting is actual quite beautiful I think. enochlau (talk) 00:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, the branches draw too much attention away from the bonnie bonnie banks of the lake itself. Andrew Levine 02:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Very emotional picture, excellent camera work, and a tribute to the Scottish portal and image collection. --PistolPower 18:38, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • SupportCuiviénen (Cuivië) 20:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Beautiful! —Snargle 06:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Calderwood 10:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support simply beautiful Kessa Ligerro 10:36, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Opppose. Pretty, but I don't think it is encyclopaedic enough. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 23:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • support Pretty, and good for the article. Borisblue 04:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Like it Hein 22:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:View of loch lomond.JPG Raven4x4x 06:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]