Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hubble Breakdown

Original - Exploded diagram of the Hubble Space Telescope, showing the equipment used in the telescope.

Alt—random capitals replaced with lower-case

Reason: This I thought was an interesting breakdown on the internal design of the Hubble Telescope, with finely drwan sections and nice labels for the material. As an svg file it can be resized easily and it definitely adds to the article by showing the equipment that goes into the telescope that makes it such a wonderful astronomer tool. As such, I submit this for FP consideration.
Articles in which this image appears: Hubble Space Telescope
Creator: AndrewBuck

Support as nominator --TomStar81 (Talk) 01:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It's definitely an interesting diagram but I don't think it has the visual flair necessary (would benefit from colour/shading), and at least in Firefox, the line thickness is slightly too large IMO. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 07:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: For a start, you would need to remove all the random capitals. So far as I am aware, at leas the majority labels are not proper nouns. J Milburn (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alt added: Most capitals replaced with lower-case, also hyphenated low- and high-gain, fixed one typo, and added : where it seemed headings were being used (e.g. in the repeated "Optical telescope assembly"). Maedin\^talk 09:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe "Fix head star tracker" should be "Fixed-head star tracker"—see here. Deor (talk) 01:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I did wonder about that one. Now corrected. Maedin\^talk 06:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another comment: Why green? And is the far left piece meant to look so ugly? As in, off-balance? J Milburn (talk) 18:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I created the picture by tracing over an existing picture by the same name (it was tagged with "covert to SVG). The version I posted is an exact (or as close as I could make it anyway) representation of what was in the original, so anything that looks funny was either drawn by the original artist. The lines are green because it makes it easy to see what has been traced and what hasn't, I just never got around to changing them to another color. -AndrewBuck (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Aperture is misspelled near the top right. -- Coneslayer (talk) 18:16, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, how did we miss that? :) Uploaded edit. Maedin\^talk 18:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 03:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You Ronald Lewis is 📖

Yawh universe 10>grow ing look closer