Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Green Flash (optical phenomenon)
- Reason
- Great EV, very good quality, interesting image of rarely seen phenomena
- Articles in which this image appears
- green flash
- Creator
- Mbz1
- Support as nominator --Mbz1 (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nom. It might be useful to add the time period that the images were taken over to the caption. Noodle snacks (talk) 02:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Lovely sequence, shows the process very clearly. I agree that mentioning the sequence's duration on the description page would improve the EV. -- Avenue (talk) 03:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support I would also like a the time period to be included on the image (but I wouldn't require it for support). Also, green flash could use an image-trim. It's pretty heavy at the moment. Jujutacular T · C 04:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nom. franklin 14:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nom --Muhammad(talk) 02:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support per nom --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Comment have you tried making this into an animation? It could be interesting to see that way. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, it would have been very interesting, but I do not know how to do it. I am willing to email you the originals, if you could do it. Of course it will take quite a few emails to send them all I am afraid :( because IMO, if we are to to make an animation, it will be better to include more images. Maybe an animation could be done from the image from the nominated image? I do have a bigger composite of the same sunset: .--Mbz1 (talk) 23:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Promoted File:Development of Green Flash.jpg —Maedin\talk 18:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)