Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Goat family
- Reason
- I don't think any other image can describe any better a goat and her two little kids.
- Articles this image appears in
- Goat Mammal
- Creator
- Fir0002
- Support as nominator — Arad 14:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- oppose - we just had a goat photo nominated by the same photographer. This photo seems to have the same strengths and same weaknesses. This is practically a renomination; let's wait and see how the other nom goes. Debivort 19:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- This is not a reason to oppose. This one is different. There is a female goat in it! --Arad 21:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Taken to it's logical extent, this becomes an obviously valid reason to oppose: "You can't oppose this nearly identical goat picture! This one has 5 blades of grass instead of 6!"Debivort 07:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't serious about my comment above. But I still believe it's OK to have 2 feature worthy images of same subject. Also this is a mature goat (the real subject) the other one are baby goats. --Arad 09:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Arad is right, there no limmit on how many similar pics can be nominated --Childzy (Talk|Contribs) 22:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't serious about my comment above. But I still believe it's OK to have 2 feature worthy images of same subject. Also this is a mature goat (the real subject) the other one are baby goats. --Arad 09:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Opppose you cant see the darker goat fully --Childzy (Talk|Contribs) 22:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- oppose The other FPC is better. 8thstar 00:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Support. I'm going to buck the trend here for what its worth. This is a quality image and does illustrate the domestic goat pretty well. I'm starting to see some pretty anally retentive opposes in voting here these days. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 20:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 11:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
