Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dandelion clock.jpg

Dandelion edit

Dandelion clock

A very nice high res image of a common dandelion.

Nominate and support. - AllyUnion (talk) 09:36, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. It's ok, but I don't like the close crop on the flower - positioning of flower in frame is a little awkward I feel. Enochlau 13:17, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the focus, very sharp and detailed on the dandelion. Love the vibrant colours too! Tekana | Talk 13:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It's not a bad picture but it looks a bit dishevelled. I would like to see more symmetry of the dandelion parachutes in a featured picture. Example photo and drawing/photo. David D. (Talk) 17:29, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oska 22:41, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
Support -- Chris 73 Talk 07:46, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
Comment I could swear I'd seen a dandelion as featured pic before. However, I would imagine it would be up at dandelion if I were right, so perhaps I'm imagining it. --bodnotbod 21:51, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you mean Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/DandelionMacro, which wasn't promoted. —Cryptic (talk) 17:06, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Distinctly average. --Rebroad 17:31, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Strongly. - Bevo 01:04, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Dandelion clock.jpg (5/1/2) ~ Veledan • Talk ^{+ new} 23:46, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A tough call this one - the figures don't add up to much, and the only really expressive comments (other than one supported support) are attached to neutral comments. I trust the people who voted neutral with an opposing comment (instead of oppose with an opposing comment) were at least accepting of the image in this form but would simply have liked to see an improved version uploaded if possible... ~ Veledan • Talk ^{+ new} 23:46, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]