Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chauteau Saumur 2

Chauteau Saumur 2 edit

Created by User:Morrisjm, uploaded to Commons. Rmhermen 16:26, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose not FPC quality, looks very soft and blurry at 100% zoom. Additionally not particularly striking. chowells 17:06, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Blurriness bothers me, but that's all. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 17:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Blurriness, and I think it's tilted. - JPM | 18:26, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yet another tilted pic - Adrian Pingstone 18:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agree with above. Alr 23:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As above, blurry. I also don't like the heavy foreground. Dylan 02:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pixel resolution is way above optical resolution --Mikeo 10:42, 29 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose. Agree with above. enochlau (talk) 14:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Being tilted and blurry is reason enough.--Ali K 05:08, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, overlit, and people in lower right corner. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:34, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Correct the tilt as far as possible (building may not be quite straight, plus perspective leads to tilt against image edge) and crop out bottom 20%, and it will be a nicer picture. - Samsara _contrib ^talk 13:13, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not sharp, distracting foreground elements. Camerafiend 19:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
( − ) Oppose Good composition, but poor image quality --Fir0002 07:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Calderwood 10:23, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 08:15, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]