Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Birdstrike

Bird Strike edit

F16 after a bird strike

It's not the most artistic or high-quality of images, but it is of fairly high resolution, pretty big size, and it is incredibly illustrative and very interesting, to say the least. Let's see what people think. Depicts Bird strike.

Nominate and support. - zafiroblue05 | Talk 23:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Extremely grainy/noisy and full of dust etc. due to origin. Chopped off subject and suboptimal angle detract greatly. --Deglr6328 00:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say the subject is chopped off, because the subject isn't the airplane. It's the window. But it is, obviously, extremely grainy and noisy. zafiroblue05 | Talk 01:13, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Mainly because the camera is too low. Walter Siegmund (talk) 03:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dirty, grainy. Good for the article, but not a FP. --Janke | Talk 10:51, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not very interesting. Confusing at first. David R. Ingham 06:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 02:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]