Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bates Hall

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2018 at 04:17:46 (UTC)

Original – Bates Hall, Boston Public Library

Alternate – denoised and brighter shadows

Reason: Renowned historical monument, captures the atmosphere of the place, good resolution and EV
Articles in which this image appears: Boston Public Library, McKim Building, Boston Public Library
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: Hari Krishnan

Support as nominator – Hari Krishnan 04:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Comment Dizzying perspective... Should either have been shot with a tilt-shift lens or been perspective-corrected in software. --Janke | Talk 07:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ~~Not used in any articles.~~ MER-C 10:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I still oppose this nomination for the noise. MER-C 09:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Image added to articles. Hari Krishnan 12:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Looks tilty and out of whack perspective-wise, perhaps because symmetrical tableau was shot a bit off-center. Sca (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Perspective corrected, uploaded over original. Revert if you don't like it. --Janke | Talk 16:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for correcting perspective. Hari Krishnan 19:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.89.66.135 (talk) [reply]

~~Support~~ Great image, portrays the subdued dynamism inside a library, good colors, proper lighting, perspective correction looks good, good EV. Kalart 22:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Struck !vote because the user doesn't meet the requirements. (Account wasn't registered 25 days ago and it didn't make 100 edits.) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:13, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is nothing like the current standard for interiors on Commons. Ceiling all grainy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support alternate – I added an alternate edited version (denoised and pulled up the levels of darker areas). Pinging those who voted @Hari Krishnan, Janke, MER-C, Sca, and Charlesjsharp:. Alternate image is a bit softer but still has good detail at full size. Bammesk (talk) 14:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think the alternative, while an improvement, is too soft to meet current standards. MER-C 21:38, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:18, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]