Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Aliquantulo Papiliones (Some Butterflies)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2014 at 14:59:42 (UTC)

Support as nominator – The Herald 14:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
These shouldn't be nominated as a set. They're not related enough to qualify. Putting them together inhibits the process. It makes it more difficult to review and circumvents actual criticism by treating them as equal. They should be nominated by species, and probably spread out a bit. 24.222.214.125 (talk) 18:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per IP. When I said that they were all on a certain topic (regarding the set I nominated), the "topic" was not such a large-scale one as "butterflies". I strongly suggest you take a look at previously successful sets. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and suggesting a speedy close. We had speedy closed similar cases in Commons too (eg. birds). What we expect in a set are pictures closely related and appear together in articles like a dorsal and ventral view of a butterfly. J e e 03:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per all of the above.--Godot13 (talk) 09:06, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Crisco 1492: @Jkadavoor: & @Godot13:Hope now its fine..--The Herald 10:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Still not a useful nomination, regardless of the merits of any of the pictures. I recommend that you stop nominating sets until you have a clearer idea of what a set is. J Milburn (talk) 03:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:17, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]