Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/1929 Belgian banknote

1929 Belgian banknote edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2012 at 17:26:17 (UTC)

Original – The frontside (top) and backside of the 10,000 Belgian franc banknote of 1929, designed by Constant Montald, approximate size 220x134,5 mm (description).

Reason: A very arty example of the oldschool banknotes, with inscriptions in several languages, notable designer. The bleed-through of the original scans has been largely fixed.
Articles in which this image appears: Belgian franc
FP category for this image: Other?
Creator

Support as nominator --Brandmeister t 17:26, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Question doesn't this image violate the Bank's stated rule about a digital reproduction being no greater than 72 dpi? Pine^talk 09:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such a requirement in NBB's terms of use. They just say that the dimensions must be either smaller than two thirds or greater than one and a half times those of the original note. I've corrected the license's text. Brandmeister t 13:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The license says for one type of allowable exception that the signatures must not be reproduced, but this image has them. For the other type of exception, "the reproduction must be in black and white or monochromatic". I don't see how this can meet either exception. Pine^talk 09:55, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding signatures, here case a of the terms applies, I think, not b. Both images are essentially monochromatic - generally, there are tones of blue and pink. Brandmeister t 16:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I'm not still convinced that this meets the terms of the license. Pine^talk 06:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'd like to see some of the obvious marks in the white section cloned out. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support after I cloned out the marks on the white section. I tried uploading it as a separate file, but for some reason it didn't work. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough support. Worth re-nominating at some point. Makeemlighter (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]