Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Simpsons shorts

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 6 supports, only 1 oppose. Promote. Spebi 03:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons shorts edit

Previous FLC

I have cleaned up the page since its last nom and I think it is consistant with the quality of the List of The Simpsons episodes. The plot summaries are a tad short, but consider that the shorts are only a minute long, so it would be difficult to make them an longer. Anyways, any concerns will be addressed. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 03:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Why did you change your mind about the list having to bring together an existing group of articles? –thedemonhog talk • edits 03:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm a strange person. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 03:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just my opinion, but, Is this really a list? I mean, I can obviously see the list of shorts, but to me, it's more of an article about the shorts, with a list tacked on the end. Not that it isn't good... it is. It's just not as much a "list" as an article with a list. Mahalo. --Ali'i 13:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's about the shorts and it includes a list about the shorts. I think that makes it a list. Several other season pages that contain substantial amounts of text are FLs, like Lost (season 1). -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 16:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - the article is a list, and defines itself as such. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 19:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but I think that the title should be "List of [The] Simpsons Shorts". There's no page for "The Simpsons episodes", so renaming it would be consistent with pre-existing pages. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 15:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think that the title should go in the centre with the airdate on the right for consistency with other lists. –thedemonhog talk • edits 01:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Organized very well and good use of sourcing. Cirt (talk) 07:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose - I wouldn't really say that this is a list. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you serious? It's quite obviously a list. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 04:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support with two questions: a) Sortable columns? b) Per thedemonhog, I think the episode title is more important, so should be the second column, rather than the airdate. Otherwise very nicely done! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 23:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]