Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of municipalities in British Columbia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 12 days, 4 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Juhachi 11:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A complete listing of all municipalities in British Columbia, by population, area, date of incorporation, and regional district. --maclean 21:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The list has a great deal of wihitespace (effectively wasted, longer scrolling):
- I realize there's been a great deal of work into superimposing the maps, but they seem of little use
- Table width at 100% just stretches the table on large displays, could do without
- A comment might be added as to the higher concentration of incorporated settlements in the Lower Mainland and the Kootenays.
- This are just suggestions, not requisite for FL status. --Qyd 16:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as I'm concerned the maps don't add that much extra whitespace. No worse than, say, List of counties in Texas. Circeus 19:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This list is formatted based on that Texas one...didn't even bother to change the colours. I understand your first two points, though, and am testing options. On your third point a map has been added showing regional districts (census divisions) by population density (by census subdivisions would be preferable). --maclean 06:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as I'm concerned the maps don't add that much extra whitespace. No worse than, say, List of counties in Texas. Circeus 19:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I really can't find anything to bitch about. Circeus 19:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Another excellent Canadian list. The layout looks fine to me. It even sorts correctly :-) Colin°Talk 20:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Well written and the only point i have is with regards to the lat-long data presented in the last column. wouldn't it be a range of lat/long than a singular point? or does the singular point represent the HQ of the municipality? --Kalyan 06:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]