The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 0 support, 3 oppose. Fail. MarcK 06:57, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Masterpiece contribution by a now-silenced editor. Among the best work on the Wikipedia project. Covers everything about the subject, backed up by diagrams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danby2007 (talk • contribs)
Oppose, though the content is extensive, there is only one reference. -- Phoenix2(talk, review) 07:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and close early per WP:SNOWBALL and WP:POINT. The "list" should be split up and referenced. Peer review may help but if the principle author really has been banned, then I suspect there is no hope for it. Colin°Talk 12:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A nomination of a banned user's work, by another banned user, of an article far from being either a "masterpiece" or "the best work on Wikipedia" that has barely been touched in eight months. This is just a waste of everyone's time — why list its many flaws if there's nobody around to fix them? Colin°Talk 21:35, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
