Wikipedia:Featured article review/Lego/archive1

Article is no longer a featured article

Review commentary

edit

Quite an old FA, appears not to meet important criteria.

  • lacks inline citations
  • needs cleanup and better structuring
    • has inappropriate (incl. inappropriately capitalized) section titles
    • external links coming before references?
    • external links awkwardly formatted
    • references awkwardly formatted
  • a trivia section is generally not recommended

TodorBozhinov 13:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also - did anybody else notice the self-referentiality? Not kosher...This one needs a fair bit of work. The Disco King 22:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the above comments - criteria 2. a. and 2. c. aren't met. Also where is the original featured article candidate page where this article was nominated for FA in the first place? I can't find it. LuciferMorgan 13:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk message left at Wikipedia talk:Wikiproject Lego. Sandy 21:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

edit
Main FA criteria concerns are writing and structure (2a) and lack of citations (2c). Marskell 10:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Message left at User talk:TodorBozhinov. Sandy 03:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]