Wikipedia:Featured article review/Helium/archive2
Helium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: DMacks,Ryboy42, WikiProject Elements, [diff for talk page notification]
I am nominating this featured article for review because it has had two cleanup banners for years now and a lack of updates for issues such as conservation, the potential new molecular compounds, and applications usage. Real4jyy (talk) 05:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Real4jyy, welcome! Per the instructions at the top of WP:FAR, please make sure to notify the original nominator and main editors about this FAR; you can add that to the notifications above once it's done. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- One of the banners was superfluous. XOR'easter (talk) 20:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- I will comment that much of the updating requested is in the #Extraction and use section. One missing thing is green helium.
- On the topic of compounds, I think that CsFHeO and N(CH3)4FHeO, are hardly worth mentioning as there are a whole collection of papers on computationally predicted molecules that have not been made. Similarly I don't think we should mention a whole lot of other theoretical molecules, but stick mainly to substances that have been made. So that means that potential new molecular compounds may just need to be pruned and not expanded. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)