Wikipedia:Featured article review/Beverage-can stove/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 12:25, 14 April 2007.
Beverage-can stove edit
Review commentary edit
- Talk messages left at Sj and Backpacking. LuciferMorgan 17:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Found this one while going through hiking-equipment articles for the newly-created backpacking project. Approved back in the days of looser standards. Well-illustrated but sorely lacking in citations. I as surprised to see the gold star; it would not be approved now. Can it be fixed or do we have to remove it? Daniel Case 03:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article is probably as comprehensive as it needs to be, however it is listy and comprised of stubby sections and paragraphs. Ceoil 21:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary edit
- Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations (1c), stub sections etc. (2). Marskell 10:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong remove. Very lacking in comprehensiveness and citations. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove. Not many people seem interested in fixing this one, and it's trending this way. Daniel Case 02:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 21:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c. Jay32183 20:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove - it would be a good GA though.. Baristarim 04:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Wouldn't pass GA as it isn't well referenced etc. LuciferMorgan 04:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- GA?! Not even as a joke!--Yannismarou 09:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Wouldn't pass GA as it isn't well referenced etc. LuciferMorgan 04:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove—GA is a joke, so it matches. Here, 1c is the problem. Inadequate attempts to address reviewers' concerns since nomination. Tony 23:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.