Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/World Wrestling Entertainment/archive1

World Wrestling Entertainment edit

I firmly believe this is a featured five-star article as it goes majorly in-depth into many areas and is suitable for many audiences. It is very acurate, with it being constatly updated each and every day. It gives the important events of the history, as well as the current champions. Davnel03 21:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object inssufficient inline citations, and the ones that are there aren't all formatted properly. Jay32183 22:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Minor Oppose Maybe a few more References.
Comment Great aticle, very well formatted. Unefficient references though is not satisfactory with an aticle that greath lenght and in that great detail. It took me about 3 days to read this because I took a portion of it each day. It is well-written and includes just about every aspect of the topic. As an editor, wrestling fan, and as an advisor you have my support.Showmanship is the key 01:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I really think the subject of WWE is a topic deserving of the front page, but I'm not sure if this article is there yet. As mentioned above, the references could be improved. I'm also very concerned about the usage of the term "Professional Wrestling." The WWE markets itself as "Sports entertainment." As sports entertainment, the WWE avoids athletic commissions and regulations surrounding these agencies. Outside agencies may refer to the events as "professional wrestling," but I cannot remember the last time I've heard the WWE use that term itself. Even WWE.COM refers to itself as "sports entertainment" because it is more about the storyline than actual competition. The introduction needs to be more of a summary of the article. The section dealing with the McMahon's is too detailed for the intro. It also needs copy edited.Balloonman 08:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]