Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer/archive1

Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer

reconstructed from incorrectly archived nom at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Virgin Atlantic GlobalFlyer

Partly a self-nom... but I think it's got a couple of interesting pics, it's tidy, complete, and the GlobalFlyer record attempt will be going off soon, so it's getting topical.--PoleyDee 23:59, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• Object. Too short, no sections, no lead section and only one reference. Evil Monkey → Talk 01:38, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
• Object. Reasons as above. - Aaron Hill 10:32, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
• Agree with Evil Monkey and Aaron Hill. Also, texts like "This plane has a LONG wing!" do not belong in an encyclopedia. Jeronimo 12:16, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Object. Way too short. CGorman 21:34, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Object. post this to peer review, get yourself some content, and then relist it in about 2-3 months. Alkivar 23:13, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Object: Too short and too many one or two clause paragraphs. The permission to use, and the copyright of the 'napkin' sketch probably needs to be explored Giano 13:28, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)