I feel that while this article is quite odd, it is of a sufficiently high quality to be featured. Bensmith53 07:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Object, this article is no-where near featured status, it is a glorified stub. 3 References isn't enough by far for featured article status. The reader wouldn't have to click on the article to read more about it as it would be all on the main page RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 10:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why did you not nominate the one where the K Foundation burns a million quid? That one's the longest.--Rmky87 17:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's also the best sourced out of any of them.--Rmky87 18:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This one had more votes than K foundation, so I thought I'd give it a try. Exploding frog isn't nearly ready. Bensmith53 04:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
