Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted 06:16, 31 January 2007.
Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan edit
Self-nomination: I put this article through a significant rewrite a couple of months ago. Since then, the article has been further refined through valuable feedback from two peer reviews (see the recent general peer review and the older WikiProject Biography review). Based on encouraging feedback from some accomplished reviewers, I have decided to nominate this article as an FA candidate. Regardless of the outcome, I will be pleased to work with any additional feedback. Cimm[talk] 23:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support (I worked on peer review). I think this meets the criteria; it's well-referenced and the prose received a lot of input in the peer review. It might be nice to have another image somewhere down the page, but it's not necessary. Nice article. Trebor 14:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. It looks comprehensive.--Yannismarou 09:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. A well-written, comprehensive, well-cited article that seems to meet or exceed all the FA criteria. Seems to have been vetted well by the PR and WikiProject Biography review processes. An FA success story. —ExplorerCDT 23:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support very interesting subject and an all-around great article. One issue though, I understand that no fair use images may be used on the main page, right? This article's only image is copyright. Will there be no image on the main page? ← ANAS Talk? 12:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nice work. I think any problems were well and truly bashed out of it in peer review before it got here. Yomanganitalk 15:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Well written and well written. I hope Cimm goes on and expands the biographies of the rest of this family. I agree the article could use another image, but quite understand the difficulty finding images for the subject we can use on Wiki. Jeffpw 23:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.