This article should be a featured article because it gives pleny of information and I think meets the guidlines to become a featured article. Arigont 23:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Arigont[reply]
Oppose: Consists mostly of tables and lists, and has only 2 references. Jeffpw 00:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, too many lists. Phoenix2 18:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Needs a lot of work, try WP:PR. Convert the lists to prose. Expand the sections. Remove the missing image. Expand the lead. Add footnotes to every paragraph, and preferably most of the sentences. Take a look at WP:Lead and WP:Footnotes. — Wackymacs 14:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
