Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Metra/archive1

This article contains a lot of information, and cites its sources. It meets WP:FA, and can be a featured article. --MasterA113 17:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object Lead is too short and doesn't summarize article, too listy, refs way insufficient. Please review recent FAs and read criteria. Rlevse 17:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object - It is indeed B-class as of now, and needs improvement to reach FA or even GA status. The WP:LEAD needs improvement and expansion. My reviewing script also points out the following (summarized): overlinking (according to WP:MOS-L), linking years that often don't provide WP:CONTEXT, needs   (see WP:MOSNUM), repetition of title in headings WP:MSH, doesn't follow WP:LAYOUT, filled with lists, and the external links should be converted to ref tags. Suggest peer review. AZ _t 17:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Do a peer review first. This article is too short and isn't that well written. Suggest peer review.Tinyboy21 19:12, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per above, needs major work. Rlevse 14:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Removing the bold since you already objected above ;). AZ _t 22:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Needs better discussion of relationship to CTA and Amtrak. Rmhermen 17:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Object. Not at all ready for FAC. Lead inadequate, lacks inline citations, listy. Further improvement and peer review suggested.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:56, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]