Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jade Goody/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 06:57, 6 July 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): --MarkusBJoke (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured article because...the article is sourced good, and its overall standard is high in accordance to the FA criterias. think its time for it to become a possible Featured article. MarkusBJoke (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
images File:OKMag.jpg fails to significantly increase reader's understanding, fails WP:NFCC, hence FAC Fasach Nua (talk) 21:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Was the significant contributor consulted before this nomination? Dabomb87 (talk) 21:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - uncited statements dating back months. Fix them. Sceptre (talk) 14:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Uncited statements; misattributed references (www.thisislondon.co.uk is the website of the Evening Standard, not a paper called This Is London, ref 1 gives the wrong publication date…); poor grammar ("Goody had become involved in vicious fight" etc); rather dubious claims ("Christian religious beliefs"? She converted three weeks before she died); a dubious statement sourced solely to a (broken) Yahoo link – and that's just on a quick skim. Please withdraw this FAC unless you're prepared to clean it up top-to-bottom – it needs a lot of work. – iridescent 17:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per Iridescent and Sceptre. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per Iridescent and Sceptre. – Cliftonianthe orangey bit 16:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.