Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fountain Fire/archive1

Fountain Fire

Featured article candidates/Fountain Fire/archive1

Nominator(s): Penitentes (talk) 19:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about the Fountain Fire, a large and destructive wildfire in rural Northern California in 1992. The fire itself largely took place over two dramatic days in late August, but its effects persisted in the region long afterward. It destroyed multiple small communities along the State Route 299 corridor and was only contained by the efforts of more than 4,400 firefighters, making it one of the most destructive and expensive wildfires in state history; as fires in the Golden State have gotten bigger and badder it no longer makes any top 10 lists but remains no slouch. The article was successfully nominated for GA in January 2023 and received a peer review in February 2024. This is my first FAC nomination.

Penitentes (talk) 19:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support from Kusma

Reserving a spot for a review. —Kusma (talk) 21:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead: what is "long-range spotting"? (Googling I get things about hunting telescopes).
"Spotting" refers to wildfire behavior wherein embers and firebrands are lofted by wind or the fire's own convective smoke column and, landing in unburnt vegetation, ignite and thus spread the fire quickly and unpredictably. I've changed the lead to "...behavior such as long-range spot fires", wiki-linking to spot fire and crown fire next to it for good measure. — Penitentes (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Background: TIL {{rp}} has a quote option. I am not sure I like it, but my personal preference is not a FAC criterion.
I'm not very attached to them, I think the relevant text is easy enough to find in those references. I've removed them. — Penitentes (talk) 14:39, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't really opposed to the quotes, just to the way they are presented, which actually violated MOS:NOHOVER. —Kusma (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could you say something here about what the vegetation / forests in Shasta County were like before the fire?
Great thought. I've added a short paragraph to the "Background" section giving some general geographic context and describing the forest—I don't think it feels redundant to the information given in the "Post-fire landscape" section but please do tell me if you feel that way. — Penitentes (talk) 14:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not a problem in my opinion. —Kusma (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
August 20: " Investigators found pine trees two–three feet (0.61–0.91 m) in diameter snapped in half.[15][19] Such vortices have been recorded ..." so was this snapping blamed on fire vortices?
It was. I've reworded this paragraph to make the attribution clearer. — Penitentes (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A map of the local area helping the reader see what is where (a bit more zoomed in than the main map) would be great to understand this section better.
Also a good idea. I'll try and whip something up in QGIS tonight if I have the time, or possibly this weekend. — Penitentes (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
August 21: again, I do not understand what "more long-range spotting" means here. The dab page spotting and wikt:spotting are both not helpful.
I've reworded this sentence as "...growth was enabled by more long-range spotting fire, as ember attack started spot fires between...", hopefully describing the actual process a little better as well as wiki-linking to spotting fire (which goes to the same place as spot fire) and ember attack. — Penitentes (talk) 13:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
August 22: what is a "hand line"? (I apologise for my lack of fire and firefighting related vocabulary)
Hand line refers to firebreaks dug/cut using hand tools instead of by bulldozers, as is also common. No need for an apology, I'm so immersed in the subject that it's very helpful to know what terms can and can't be gleaned by fresh readers. I've rephrased it in the article to "constructed firebreaks by hand" and added that wiki-link to firebreak. — Penitentes (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Firefighting effort: is it worth giving more context on the $22 million by using {{inflation}} or similar?
Done. — Penitentes (talk) 15:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am allergic to false precision, so would prefer |r=0. —Kusma (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Criticism and response: "it interviewed 24 different fire officials" here, "it" is "the report"; did the report really do interviews?
Changed to "it relied on interviews with...". — Penitentes (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Closures and evacuations: how long did the evacuation order last?
I agree that this is necessary. It'll take a little longer to dig through the sources but I will try and do it this evening/this weekend, along with the map you mentioned above. — Penitentes (talk) 15:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I think this is largely done. It's difficult to pinpoint what communities were evacuated for which time periods, but I've added this text, which is supported by existing references. "Some residents of burned areas were able to access their properties on August 23 and 24. By August 25, Big Bend, Moose Camp, and Hillcrest were the only communities still under mandatory evacuation orders, and almost all evacuees were able to return by August 28." — Penitentes (talk) 21:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Salvage logging: " 10 families belonging to the Pit River Tribe of Native Americans occupied Smith Camp " had occupied?
Inserted. — Penitentes (talk) 14:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Herbicide application and replanting: link second-growth forest.
Done. — Penitentes (talk) 14:35, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cause: this section comes a bit late for my taste. Perhaps before "Effects" might work just as well or better?
You're totally right. Moved to before "Effects". — Penitentes (talk) 14:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The prose is in excellent shape already. Some specialist terminology could perhaps be glossed/avoided, but overall I find very little to complain about. I am amazed that this is your first FAC. —Kusma (talk) 22:14, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind! I've responded to all of the comments above, and made changes pursuant to them (barring the new map and the evacuation duration). — Penitentes (talk) 15:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent changes. I am happy to hear you are working on an additional map and have one minor point above, but this is already good enough for me to support. —Kusma (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]