Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cryptography/archive1

Cryptography edit

This article seems to be well writen in my opinion, it's not biased, and it has some nice external links for additional information. It follows the Manual of Style, and is accurate IMO. Exir Kamalabadi (Talk)(contribs) 04:59, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

Object, it's a well structured summary article, but it has no references, also some more images would be nice--nixie 05:06, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object. No references. Otherwise, the article seems fine, though. No need for additional images, IMHO. Phils 11:54, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional Support - Referance the article and i'll support it. --ZeWrestler 14:06, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Object This is very much a summary article, and I don't think it's quite FA status. --JB Adder | Talk 23:52, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
Object. Many external links are given, and the article is somewhat thorough, but offline references need to be cited to inform readers where the author(s) got the information from. — Stevey7788 (talk) 17:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. One word: comprehensive. Also rare to see such good articles with open-ends on Wikipedia. Deryck C. 09:25, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Mild object. Unless inline reference is done. -- Jerry Crimson Mann 18:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]