Comment - I am completing the nomination for an anonymous user who did not complete the process for nomination. Johntex\talk 00:27, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I think this is a very informative article. One thing I would like to see before FAC is a discussion of plays and strategies used in the game. Johntex\talk 00:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object- Lack of references and inline citations, criteria 2(c). Could the lead be expanded- per WP:LEAD? AndyZ 00:58, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object - I wrote a good portion of this article, and I don't think it's feature quality. It needs inline citations, a more complete history section, and more reliable print references. There used to be more lists on the page, but I still think they're unseemly. --djrobgordon 03:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object- Lack of references, but, also, not nearly enough to encompass all of college football. PDXblazers 04:34, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per above comments. Lacks enough content, dosen't have a prominent lead and lacks references. AreJay 23:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Absolutely no referene section, and huge amounts of listed items. Staxringold 03:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
