Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Clan Fraser/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 23:04, 16 March 2007.
Self-nomination: I've been working on this article for god knows how long, on-and-off, and I feel it's been above GA status for quite awhile, now. I believe it to at least meet all of the FA criteria, and surpass some of them. 
Canæn 08:34, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Article is too listy in places, a violation of 1. a. LuciferMorgan 10:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment How would you present the information given in the various sections that appear listy (I'm assuming you're talking about the lists of battles)? I'd love to improve it any way I could.
Canæn 03:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC) - Comment Has this been established in effect by consistent opposition on these grounds? 1 a makes no mention of lists, simply saying that the prose should be good. Canæn 06:18, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment How would you present the information given in the various sections that appear listy (I'm assuming you're talking about the lists of battles)? I'd love to improve it any way I could.
- Oppose as per lucifer, it also has a lot of red links Ahadland 23:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Red links represent a lack of adequate Wikipedia coverage on related articles, but not on this article itself. Should the lack of coverage in other areas hold this article back from Featured status? Canæn 03:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've cut the red links in half or so. There are some left, yes. Those articles need to be created. Canæn 19:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've cut the red links in half or so. There are some left, yes. Those articles need to be created.
- Comment Red links represent a lack of adequate Wikipedia coverage on related articles, but not on this article itself. Should the lack of coverage in other areas hold this article back from Featured status?
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.