Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bayrak/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 20:17, 9 January 2007.

Bayrak

News Media Source from an unrecognized state

Damon Seath 22:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: This article is more of a stub than a FA. It is only a few paragraphs, and has no references. Have you considered submitting it for a peer review, and using the suggestions to expand it? As it is now, it is both too short and unsourced, which exclude it from FA consideration. Jeffpw 23:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Object Good start, but it hardly meets any of the FA requirements. Try peer review first. Gzkn 00:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Object This isn't the place now. And, as Gzkn points out, it doesn't actually meet any of the FA requirements. Please remove, add more information, use references, get a Peer Review and return with something. KP Botany 00:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I take that back. There aren't any edit wars, so I guess it's stable. Might be neutral, too. Although it is an Eastern European topic, so who knows what might happen... ;) Gzkn 01:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, heck for the topic, stability is major. I thought stability was a GA criteria? Still, that's something. Neutrality needs more than voice to verify, though. KP Botany 01:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Object and remove per WP:SNOW. Rlevse 03:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Per Rlevse, this is covered by WP:SNOW Semperf 04:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This needs to goto WP:PR. — Wackymacs 13:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's not even GA yet! Strong Object TRKtv t c e 18:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please snowball this nomination out of here Pascal.Tesson 03:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this article obviously needs way more work. ← ANAS ^Talk? 13:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Object Not stable, needs more work to be featured, recommend WP:PR, and WP:SNOW the FAC. Hello32020 21:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.