Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/ASCII art/archive1

ASCII Art

Very informative, great examples, written in a very professional viewpoint and style, great layout. I'm surprised it hasn't been a featured article in the past, really. 64.135.205.238 02:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object a decent article but the way it uses referencing is insufficient. It should use ref tags or inline cites etc.. Too many links. RN 02:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Waaaaay too many examples and links with basically no refs. Staxringold _talk^contribs 13:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object ref not in proper format and all the samples make it look more like a manual. Sumoeagle179 23:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object, the history of ASCII art does not seem to be explained. Too many examples, not enough references. Needs some cleanup too. Refer to WP:PR. — Wackymacs 12:20, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]