Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Plasma lamp

Plasma lamp edit

Cropped version of image taken by Luc Viatour, from Plasma (physics)

Edited and improved version

I searched for Plasma, and this was at the top of the article. Immediately striking, and well taken. Very slightly unfocused, but if I get the time to do a slightly lower resolution version that could be fixed. The colour is amazing. I already nominated M4 Carbine Casing which was a success, so I thought this might be recognized as well. Let it be known that I did not take or upload this. I am just nominating it because I saw it on the article and thought it was worthy. There are also two other Featured Pictures currently in the article, the Voyager Heliosheath diagram and the Energy Arc.

Nominate and Support. - —Vanderdecken^∫ξφ 12:52, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great image, good background. -Falcorian 04:17, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sweet shot, amigo. A rare find indeed. TomStar81 09:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
( + ) Support It's not particularly sharp, but I don't think that can be fixed on this photo unless you reshoot. Good background and colors, plus I really like plasma balls. --Fir0002 08:02, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
( + ) Support - Support for sure. Every bit as good as mine, even better in some ways. A worthy FP.PiccoloNamek 08:32, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think you accidentally removed my vote when you copied my support template for your vote Piccolo. Never mind, fixed now. --Fir0002 10:44, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support, quite spectacular. I'm not sure how sharp this sort of shot can be, but it looks fine to me. Raven4x4x 23:58, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very beautiful image. Carioca 04:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Really no need for more support, is there? --Janke | Talk 13:49, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Not as pretty as current featured picture Image:Photos-photos 1087592507 Energy Arc.jpg, but more illustrative. —Cryptic (talk) 05:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
( + ) Support. --Lysy ^(talk) 19:20, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
New version, removed all artefacts in the background (of which there were quite a few) and adjusted colours slightly. The file size is smaller too. —Vanderdecken^∫ξφ 20:05, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support either one. Tito xd^{(?!? - did you read this?)} 03:25, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support any of the two --Roger McLassus 09:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support both Kessa Ligerro 10:39, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support either. It's going on my desktop as wallpaper now. Enochlau 15:31, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support and comment. I had been meaning to add this[1]] to wikipedia for quite a while now and this featured picture has reminded me. I definitely agree that this one is a higher quality image, but I like the illustration in my photo of exactly how the plasma is 'attracted' to a conducting object. Diliff 01:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Plasma-lamp_2.jpg Raven4x4x 03:22, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]