The article on Media bias is, I think, badly in need some professionalism and is now rather rambling and full of weasel words. While some of the material and sections are sound, others are in serious need of an objective eye. This is a potentially difficult subject with POV pushing on both the liberal and conservative sides of the spectrum. I feel the article is in need a major rewrite and have put up a "to do" list and tagged the article and some of the sections as dubious. I don't think there's any bad intentions going on, but the article needs help and I fear it might spin off into an edit war unless we can get more substantiated, sourced material within the body of the article. Any assistance you and the cleanup task force can provide would be most welcome. Calicocat 03:29, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
Requests and Suggestions edit
My edits will be mainly of the copyediting and NPOV variety. Is there any specific problems that you feel I need to address? Kerowyn 11:01, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
Religion and new religious movements has some doubtful quotes all going back to the source Larry Moffit who is member of the Unification Church working for an Unification Church newspaper and therefore not non-partisan. I'm don't know much about American media, but e.g. the Dart-Allen paper can IMO not be condensed to the quote given here. I offered my two cents in Talk:Opposition to cults and new religious movements#Media with the result that the doubtful quotes were moved to Media bias with the reasoning "I hate loosing good text" - I am not wholly convinced that this is a good solution (or that it is good text) and I'd be glad if someone could check into the matter and straighten it up as needed. --Irmgard 13:24, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- The mentioned quotes seem fairly useless in the context of media bias. I will clean it up and get rid of most of the quotes, although we should have a section on media bias and religion. Kerowyn 09:52, 26 September 2005 (UTC)