Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/NeuRobot 3
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was
Withdrawn by operator.
Operator: — neuro(talk)(review)
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): AWB
Function Overview: Tagging non-free SVG logos with {{SVG-logo}}
Edit period(s): Daily(ish)
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details: Please see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MifterBot I -- I am picking up this job for a bot which is no longer running. The task was 
Approved for that bot.
Discussion
editI'm glad to see someone removed the misleading crap from that template. Hopefully it stays off.
I see Mifter is still active, have you asked whether the MifterBot is actually no longer performing the task? Anomie⚔ 02:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's a good point, don't know why I didn't do that first. Done. — neuro(talk)(review) 12:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hey there, yes I am still running the bot ;), I have not run it for a while because of the large amount of time and resources it takes to generate the new lists and the long time delay is to allow for a larger amount of .svg images to be uploaded as to conserve resources. I was actually planning on running the bot again this weekend being that I haven't run this bot in a while and their should be a bunch of new images ready to tag :). All the Best, Mifter (talk) 02:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Also, I had been having some problems with AWB which have sense been fixed which had also been hampering my ability to run my bot ;). All the Best, Mifter (talk) 02:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Is there any harm in getting two bots to do this? — neuro(talk)(review) 11:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- There's no need, it's not that huge of a task. Anomie⚔ 13:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn by operator. Will reapply in a month or so if MifterBot doesn't continue doing it. — neuro(talk)(review) 01:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- There's no need, it's not that huge of a task. Anomie⚔ 13:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Is there any harm in getting two bots to do this? — neuro(talk)(review) 11:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Also, I had been having some problems with AWB which have sense been fixed which had also been hampering my ability to run my bot ;). All the Best, Mifter (talk) 02:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hey there, yes I am still running the bot ;), I have not run it for a while because of the large amount of time and resources it takes to generate the new lists and the long time delay is to allow for a larger amount of .svg images to be uploaded as to conserve resources. I was actually planning on running the bot again this weekend being that I haven't run this bot in a while and their should be a bunch of new images ready to tag :). All the Best, Mifter (talk) 02:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.