Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MonoBot 8
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by operator.
Operator: Mønobi
Automatic or Manually Assisted: auto - unsupervised
Programming Language(s): python
Function Summary: fix double redirects
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): continuous
Edit rate requested: maxlag = 5
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function Details: use redirect.py to fix double redirects
Discussion
edit- Need it really run continuously? What sort of pattern are you thinking of? Also, unless I'm mistaken, you've specified a maxlag parameter, but not an edit rate — they're quite distinct. — Werdna talk 04:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It won't run non-stop. I'll throw it up on crontab. Yes, I have maxlag. It will edit as fast as it needs to unless the maxlag is over 5s. Pywikipedia also has a built-in throttle somewhere, so it won't be make 100 edits a minute ;) Mønobi 20:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - Redirect.py isn't too complicated, no harm in duplicate bots. Soxred93 | talk bot 02:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you completed your trial yet? :) SQLQuery me! 09:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - Redirect.py isn't too complicated, no harm in duplicate bots. Soxred93 | talk bot 02:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It won't run non-stop. I'll throw it up on crontab. Yes, I have maxlag. It will edit as fast as it needs to unless the maxlag is over 5s. Pywikipedia also has a built-in throttle somewhere, so it won't be make 100 edits a minute ;) Mønobi 20:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Closing as expired. — Werdna talk 13:19, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.