Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Kwjbot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Denied.

kwjbot

Operator: Kwj2772 (talk)

Automatic or Manually Assisted:Manually

Programming Language(s):Python 2.5 pywikipedia

Function Summary:interwiki, clean sandbox, fix double redirect, welcome new member

Edit period(s) '':daily

Edit rate requested: 1 edits per 5 second

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):no

Function Details:interwiki(en,ko,ja), clean sandbox(en,ko), fix double redirect(en,ko), welcome new member(en,ko,150 member per order)

Discussion

I'm concerned that "welcome new member" type tasks do not historically have consensus to be done by bots - can you explain this task in more detail? —Random832 14:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The sandbox is already thoroughly cleaned, although more the merrier I supposed. In addition, welcome bots are usually always denied as the point of welcoming new users with a bot basically defeats the purpose of welcoming them. More details on how the bot will actually preform these actions, IE: Cleaning the Sandbox will also give the BAG a better overview to make a more informed decision. Q ^{T C} 15:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflicted) Declined for the welcome part. Also, with all due respect, the operator seems quite unexperienced in my opinion. The bot also run unapproved before OverlordQ reported it. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 15:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
His bot has more edits than him already... Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 16:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This should be declined because the operator has less than 50 edits and all appropriate tasks are already performed by other bots. 24.84.40.108 (talk) 17:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)— 24.84.40.108 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Theres nothing wrong with duplicate bots. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 20:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Denied. Looking over the user's contributions, I do not believe they have enough experience as of yet. Soxred93 | talk bot 22:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.