Wikipedia:Article improvement drive/Removed/27 February 2005

Antigua and Barbuda*

Reason

Could be longer. Needs a map.

Support

1. Maurreen 07:07, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. Dmcdevit 18:21, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
3. Tuf-Kat 03:18, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
4. kaal 06:02, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
5. Darwinek 19:32, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Comments

• Has a CIA map and a map of the administrative divisions. What specific map did you have in mind? --Golbez 21:07, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
• The map does not show for me, but the box does. Maurreen 01:46, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

---

Criticisms of War on Terrorism*

Reason

Writing needs work. It's not cohesive and there are grammar problems. Attribution is also weak. On the other hand, this could become contentious.

Support

1. Maurreen 06:29, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. Litefantastic 17:48, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
3. 119 19:28, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
4. Darwinek 19:30, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
5. GuloGuloGulo 01:44, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)

Comments

• Totally agree. Important but volitile subject; heavily POV just now. -Litefantastic 17:48, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

---

Culture*

Reason

The article is now fairly deep but narrow.

Support

1. Maurreen 05:58, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. Tuf-Kat 17:47, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)

Comments

---

Graphic design*

Reason

Mostly about the history, little on the principles and practices.

Support

1. Maurreen 05:58, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Comments

---

Poetry*

Reason

Saw this on the Wikipedia: featured article removal candidates. It's a holdover from the less stringent FA rules, I'd guess. It definitely needs work -- that list is ugly, it's nowhere near comprehensive and there's a single reference! --Dmcdevit 07:35, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Support

1. Dmcdevit 07:35, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. Maurreen 08:20, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
3. Tuf-Kat 01:29, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
4. Felix Wan 22:55, 2005 Feb 26 (UTC)

Comments

---

Pope John Paul I*

Reason

I tried to get this passed to FA, but couldn't. Too heavily biased and very rumor-ridden, it needs help.

Support

1. Litefantastic 17:46, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. 119 08:21, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
3. Maurreen 04:22, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Comments

• Not that far away from FA, methinks. It needs POV patching and maybe some reasearch, but the framework is there. -Litefantastic 17:46, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

---

Voyager 1*

Reason

Both the voyager missions did a lot of science and very little is covered in the article.

Support

1. kaal 06:11, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. 119 08:21, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Comments

• cannot nominate for the COTW as not stub, but still very brief.

---

Voyager 2*

Reason

Both the voyager missions did a lot of science and very little is covered in the article.

Support

1. kaal 06:11, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. 119 08:21, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Comments

• cannot nominate for the COTW as not stub, but still very brief.

Non-Aligned Movement*

Reason

Extensively linked-to article which is currently very far from comprehensive and lacks references.

Support

1. 119 08:33, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. Maurreen 04:22, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Comments

---

Duck and Cover (film)*

Reason

The cold war paranoia film!

Support

1. Litefantastic 00:17, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
2. Circeus 00:57, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
3. 119 05:00, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Comments

• I tried to get this passed to FA twice, and was shut down both times. When I discovered the COTW, I posted it there, but had to remove it when they told me things had to be stubs. Perhaps it will do better here. -Litefantastic 00:17, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

---