If you have a suggestion for a topic area for Wikipedia:Article assessment please add it to the list below in the proper category.
Choice discussion
editThis is for discussion of forthcoming topics. An archive of discussions for previous topic choices can be found here.
Topic starting 13 March 2006
editI'm thinking that a literature topic might be good this week, particularly if we can get the novels wikiproject involved. violet/riga (t) 20:45, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Reading through the suggestions, 9/11 hijackers stands out. Perhaps we could do something else this week and get the novels wikiproject involved so that they could give us an idea of what literature topic would be the right size? Personally I don't know enough about literature articles to say what would be a good list... I think if we choose 20th century fictional novels we're bound to get a whole lot of nominations though and very few of actual merit. Just my two cents. -DMurphy 22:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- How about Science Fiction? By the way, who and how do we decide on a suggestion? Can someone leave that in my talk page? Thanks. Mkaycomputer 19:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- I wouldn't mind sci-fi novels.--HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 01:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- How about Science Fiction? By the way, who and how do we decide on a suggestion? Can someone leave that in my talk page? Thanks. Mkaycomputer 19:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think I'll get to create this tonight as I will be offline. I'll try and sort it out in the morning if nobody else has done it already, but I'd like to see some more discussion of the topic choice first. violet/riga (t) 19:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
So the main choice seems to be one of the following two:
- Science fiction novels (possibly limited to a specific decade)
- Participants in the September 11, 2001 attacks
Which do we think? violet/riga (t) 22:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I did some searching on the subject, and science-fiction novels is far too broad. There are over 700 Science Fiction Novels alone. If we really want to do a sci-fi novel topic, we'll have to do something like:
- Time Travel in Fiction = ~40 articles
- Dystopian novels = ~65 articles
- Hugo Award-winning works (the premier award for sci-fi and fantasy works) = ~50 articles
Or if you want to get a little more obscure:
- Enderverse articles = ~45 articles (counting character articles) - articles about the Ender's Game series, one of the most popular Sci-fi series.
- Military sci-fi = ~30 articles
- Cyberpunk works = ~50 articles
Personally I think the Hugo Award-winning works would be a good category and would give us just the right amount of variety (a little sci-fi and a little fantasy), plus all the articles are bound to be books of importance unlike the other categories, which will likely be obscure. Otherwise, I think we should go with a biography category, but I also agree that right now none of the suggestions are entirely exciting. -DMurphy 22:55, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hugo Award-winning works has my full support - I'll do that when I have time (hopefully this evening). violet/riga (t) 11:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
General discussion
editGeography, Economics and Government
editCulture of a country
editAny "Culture of [country]" article. See Category:Culture by nationality. violet/riga (t) 16:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- This might be too wide as well. violet/riga (t) 23:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Perhaps narrow it to a specific continent? In that case I'd say either Europe or Asia would be the best option. --DMurphy 01:36, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
U.S. State Supreme Courts
editE.g. New Hampshire Supreme Court and Maryland Court of Appeals. There is a bounty on these articles as well. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 16:54, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Fortune 500 companies
editFortune 500 companies. --Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Seems a little broad for my taste. -DMurphy 01:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
NGOs. --Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Modern cities with fewer than 50,000 people
editModern cities with fewer than 50,000 people. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- How many articles on modern cities with < 50,000 are there of note anyway? seems too restrictive/uninteresting. -DMurphy 23:10, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- True - there may be some other way we can choose cities without it being too open. violet/riga (t) 23:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Deserts
editDeserts. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Elections
editArticles about an election result. violet/riga (t) 18:52, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Political party
editArticles about a current political party. violet/riga (t) 18:52, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
People (Biographies)
editAny category that would include articles on individuals or small groups.
- biography for author and motivational speaker Ali R. Jaber
9/11 hijackers
editOf the 19, one is a featured article and none are stubs. So there would be 18 candidates. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 14:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. This is a closed list, in that there are only 19. Is that poor form? Is this open to both "open" and "closed" topics? Would "planets" be acceptable, even though there are only 9 or so? – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 14:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I can't see any problem with having closed topics, and this looks like a good suggestion to me. violet/riga (t) 17:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Biography of a novelist
editThe biography of any novelist that has had at least 5 books published. violet/riga (t) 16:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- This might be too wide. violet/riga (t) 23:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Fans of Liverpool F.C.
editFans of Liverpool F.C. (list here) -DMurphy 01:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
People born on January 1
editPeople born on January 1. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Millionaires
editMillionaires. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- There's a lot of those... I think it needs to be narrowed. -DMurphy 01:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Um, billionaires? The first was Rockefeller, iirc. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 13:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- We could do Australian Millionaires, or Millionaires under the age of 20... violet/riga (t) 15:35, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- Um, billionaires? The first was Rockefeller, iirc. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 13:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
People named Laura
editPeople named Laura. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'd shy away from obscure ways to connect articles like this. Sure, it makes the nomination process a bit more fun, but when we get to the evaluation, there would be no real method for comparison like we had with Natural Disasters. --DMurphy 04:13, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
People who died in unusual ways
editPeople who died in unusual ways. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Or the unusual ways in which they died.--HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 01:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Pop Culture (Movies, Music, Sports, etc.)
editMusic Single
editSee No Man's Land It currently has a stub class and I've seen Start Up/C Class articles that are worse than this
CVG Genres
editAny computer and/or video game genre. Partial list here, full list here. Nifboy 23:09, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- That's a good idea. We could look at, for example, all fighting games. violet/riga (t) 23:48, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- How about Browser-based games? The category has 40 articles (if counting Neopets and not counting flash games) and a pretty good cross-section of quality. --DMurphy 05:24, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Beatles articles
editArticles pertaining to The Beatles. -DMurphy 01:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Magic
edit- How about articles about magicians and illusionists? - Mgm|(talk) 11:13, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Television
edit--Melaen 20:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Fictional families
editCategory:Fictional families --Melaen 20:58, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
National personifications
editCategory:National personifications. --Melaen 21:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Team sports
editSee Category:Team sports. violet/riga (t) 22:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Football / soccer Could we possibly include other categories such as assists or cleans sheets when looking at players stats. Especially to see defender and midfield contributions
Stock characters
editCategory:Stock characters. Melaen 21:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Pokémon
editNice wide topic, characters to creatures to videogames and back again. 20 or so articles could easily be found that are of good quality or good but need tips. Cheers, Highway Rainbow Sneakers 16:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Category:Shakespeare on film .... 02:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Sports Biographys
editLike American Football, Baseball, Hockey, Soccer, Basketball Biographys Jaranda wat's sup 04:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Science and History (excluding Biographies)
editIncludes articles on plants and animals (other than humans).
Vegetables
editVegetables. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
19th century wars
edit19th century wars (i.e. War of 1812). -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Board games
edit- Let's check our coverage of board games. - Mgm|(talk) 11:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Ancient civilisations
editAs suggested by Mgm. A great idea. Looking at Category:Ancient peoples there are quite a few, so we'd need to have some form of criteria. violet/riga (t) 22:06, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Butterflies
editButterfly Search on wikipedia. Lots of near-good butterfly articles that are overlooked. Submissions wont be too long nor too short. Spawn Man 22:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Technology
editManmade things, excluding Pop Culture stuff.
Poisons
editPoisons. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- How do you define a 'poison'? Something poisonous to humans? If that's the case there are hundreds of chemical articles that would fit the bill. -DMurphy 01:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- But few of any good quality. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 13:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Musical instruments
editMusical instruments. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Operating Systems
editoperating systems - This covers a great many articles, some are truly pitiful stubs, but others, such as Windows 2000 and OpenBSD are featured. 65.94.60.61 19:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Literature
edit20th century novels
editdidnt see any literature category - would be interesting to do a sampling of 20th century fictional novels, as there are so few featured (i counted 2, with 1 about to be de-featured). could also be a combined effort with the novels wikiproject. Zzzzz 18:21, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Great idea - that's inspired a few other suggestions... violet/riga (t) 18:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Children's books
editFamous novels aimed at children. violet/riga (t) 18:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Series of novels
editArticles about series of books, such as Discworld (though I'm not sure how many other ones there are). violet/riga (t) 18:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Anything that comes in threes: these articles could be books or movies, and they'd have to be on the trilogy itself, not just one installment.--HereToHelp (talk • contribs) 01:15, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Simple Groupings, Multiple categories
editGrouping by a simple trait (ie Things that are red) that groups articles falling into multiple categories
Things usually bright red
editThings usually bright red (e.g. cherries). -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Articles starting with "str"
editArticles starting with "str". -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Things you might do in your sleep
editThings you might do in your sleep (e.g. sweat). -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Things mentioned in Beatles song titles
editThings mentioned in Beatles song titles (e.g. submarine or diamonds)
- On that note, how about Beatles articles? There's plenty of them. (suggestion here) --DMurphy 04:13, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I prefer not to have suggestions with a tangental connection. Beatles articles seems like a better bet. - Mgm|(talk) 11:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Articles with the number 7 in the title
editArticles with the number 7 in the title. -Quadell (talk) (bounties) 02:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Other
editNews items
editWe could look at all the major news stories of one particular month. Perhaps the best idea would be to do one from last month or from this month last year. violet/riga (t) 23:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- Personally I think current news articles tend to be disproportionately large, and we could probably better serve the wiki if we evaluated articles of more historical or encyclopaedic significance. Plus, since the articles draw so many participants, they tend to be pretty accurate. Just my opinion though. --DMurphy 04:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Roller coasters
editCategory:Roller coasters. violet/riga (t) 22:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Ivy League Universities
editOr more broadly some sort of Universities category --Xtreambar 02:51, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Education
edit- Could someone write an article about European Academy of Education?
Cocktails
editCocktails. Melaen 20:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Sports terms
editQuarterback, Armlock... --CasualFighter 17:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Illuminati, Ku Klux Klan, Skull and Bones, Freemasons - Some interesting questions of citations vs. secrecy. Tom Harrison Talk 01:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)