Wikipedia:Article assessment/Natural disasters/Tunguska event
Assessment of an article under the topic Natural disasters.
Article: Tunguska event
Details of the assessment method can be found at the main page. Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.
Review by violet/riga (t) edit
- Coverage and factuality: 7
- Covers it well but is not referenced
- Writing style: 8
- Generally very good but some slightly confused sentences
- Structure: 9
- Well-structured, though the "Select Eyewitness Reports" may need some work
- Aesthetics: 8
- Generally very good, but some parts of the article are purely text and could do with an image, particularly "Speculative hypotheses" and "Tunguska event in fiction"
- Overall: 8
A good article, but let down by far too few references. violet/riga (t) 23:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Review by MacGyverMagic edit
- Coverage and factuality: 9
- Needs explanation of some jargon and sorting and inline use of references. (Sources aren't named as such). Material is properly covered.
- Writing style: 8
- Few odd phrases. Some possible POV and some explanations and expansion needed. All fixable. Holds interest.
- Structure: 7
- No tables or templates. Good use of images, but might need slight reorder. Kind of witness report heavy. Lead could be longer. Sections are fine, but could use slight reorder.
- Aesthetics: 9.
- No tables and templates, but excellent image use.
- Overall: 8
- Generally good, but could use some touch ups and minor fixes.
Anyone who wants more details about the things I mentioned to fix the article, can ask for it on my talk page. - Mgm|(talk) 21:29, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Review by [name] edit
- Coverage and factuality:
- Writing style:
- Structure:
- Aesthetics:
- Overall: