Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks
Noticeboard
editClerks' Noticeboard
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
| Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anachronist | 16 June 2024 | 0/6/0 | |
| Rio Grande 223 | 19 June 2024 | 0/5/0 |
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 7 June 2024 |
| Clarification request: mentioning the name of off-wiki threads | none | none | 4 June 2024 |
| Amendment request: India-Pakistan | none | (orig. case) | 7 June 2024 |
| Clarification request: Contentious topics restrictions | none | none | 10 June 2024 |
| Amendment request: World War II and the history of Jews in Poland | none | (orig. case) | 21 June 2024 |
| Motion name | Date posted |
|---|---|
| Block of Rp2006 | 21 June 2024 |
This noticeboard's primary purpose is to to attract the attention of the clerks to a particular matter by non-clerks. Non-clerks are welcome to comment on this page in the event that the clerks appear to have missed something.
Private matters
The clerks may be contacted privately, in the event a matter could not be prudently addressed publicly (i.e., on this page), by composing an email to clerks-l
lists.wikimedia.org; only the clerk team and individual arbitrators have access to emails sent to that list.
Procedures
A procedural reference for clerks (and arbitrators) is located here.
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.
Unsure as to revert
editHi I'm having a hard time understanding the rules for wikipedia and find it difficult to understand the articles on it.
Recently I was discussing points on a talk thread and the posts were reverted with the following comment "Reverted 1 edit by Galdrack (talk): Per WP:ARBECR". I think it's because the posts were deemed to be non-constructive but the implication is with the status of my account I can only make suggested edits and can't contribute to the discussion itself? The rational I was given was rather poor so I'm still confused as to the rules/reasoning. Galdrack (talk) 14:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Until you have made 500 edits, you are not allowed to edit in the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area. The only exception to this is for you to be able to make constructive edit requests, but participating in other discussions is not allowed. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 16:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- "but participating in other discussions is not allowed" Ok this was the one I wasn't sure of mainly, so there had/have been several entries by <500 entry users on the post and remain. I'm not bothered by that but is my understanding the comments are allowed so long as they're (in the opinion of 500> entry users) contributing to the conversation? And in turn those 500> entry users can then delete the comments they deem less constructive? Galdrack (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- While the rule is to not allow these comments, removing them may be an issue if another editor has already replied as removing the comment then removes the context that surrounded it. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- "but participating in other discussions is not allowed" Ok this was the one I wasn't sure of mainly, so there had/have been several entries by <500 entry users on the post and remain. I'm not bothered by that but is my understanding the comments are allowed so long as they're (in the opinion of 500> entry users) contributing to the conversation? And in turn those 500> entry users can then delete the comments they deem less constructive? Galdrack (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Starting a request for amendment
editI would like to ask to amend two bans issued to me. Here is my statement [1]. Can someone help me please to properly start the amendment? I am not sure who should be notified about it. I assume that users @Volunteer Marek: and @Piotrus: should be notified because one of the remedies includes a one-sided interaction ban with them. Thank you. My very best wishes (talk) 22:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! That was fast. My very best wishes (talk) 23:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
