Open main menu

Wikipedia β

Wear is related to interactions between surfaces and specifically the removal and deformation of material on a surface as a result of mechanical action of the opposite surface.mechanical wear is caused by most use of metal by sliding, impact, cutting etc..

In materials science, wear is erosion or sideways displacement of material from its "derivative" and original position on a solid surface performed by the action of another surface.

Wear of metals occurs by the plastic displacement of surface and near-surface material and by the detachment of particles that form wear debris. The size of the generated particles may vary from millimeter range down to an ion range.[1] This process may occur by contact with other metals, nonmetallic solids, flowing liquids, or solid particles or liquid droplets entrained in flowing gasses.[2]

Wear can also be defined as a process where interaction between two surfaces or bounding faces of solids within the working environment results in dimensional loss of one solid, with or without any actual decoupling and loss of material. Aspects of the working environment which affect wear include loads and features such as unidirectional sliding, reciprocating, rolling, and impact loads, speed, temperature, but also different types of counter-bodies such as solid, liquid or gas and type of contact ranging between single phase or multiphase, in which the last multiphase may combine liquid with solid particles and gas bubbles.[3]

Rear (driven) bicycle sprockets. New, left, shows no wear. Right, used, show obvious wear from being driven clockwise.


Stages of wearEdit

Under normal mechanical and practical procedures, the wear-rate normally changes through three different stages(ref.4):

  • Primary stage or early run-in period, where surfaces adapt to each other and the wear-rate might vary between high and low.
  • Secondary stage or mid-age process, where a steady rate of ageing is in motion. Most of the components operational life is comprised in this stage.
  • Tertiary stage or old-age period, where the components are subjected to rapid failure due to a high rate of ageing.

The secondary stage is shortened with increasing severity of environmental conditions such as higher temperatures, strain rates, stress and sliding velocities etc.
Note that, wear rate is strongly influenced by the operating conditions. Specifically, normal loads and sliding speeds play a pivotal role in determining wear rate. In addition, tribo-chemical reaction is also important in order to understand the wear behavior. Different oxide layers are developed during the sliding motion. The layers are originated from complex interaction among surface, lubricants, and environmental molecules. In general, a single plot, namely wear map, demonstrating wear rate under different loading condition is used for operation. This graph also represents dominating wear modes under different loading conditions (ref. 13).

In explicit wear tests simulating industrial conditions between metallic surfaces, there are no clear chronological distinction between different wear-stages due to big overlaps and symbiotic relations between various friction mechanisms. Surface engineering and treatments are used to minimize wear and extend the components working life. [4][5]


The study of the processes of wear is part of the discipline of tribology. The complex nature of wear has delayed its investigations and resulted in isolated studies towards specific wear mechanisms or processes.[6] Some commonly referred to wear mechanisms (or processes) include:

  1. Adhesive wear
  2. Abrasive wear
  3. Surface fatigue
  4. Fretting wear
  5. Erosive wear
  6. Corrosion wear and oxidation wear

A number of different wear processes are also commonly encountered and presented in the literature.[3] Impact-, cavitation-, diffusive- and corrosive- wear are all such examples.
These wear mechanisms, however, do not necessarily act independently and wear mechanisms are not mutually exclusive.[7] "Industrial Wear" are commonly described as incidence of multiple wear mechanisms occurring in unison. Another way to describe "Industrial Wear" is to define clear distinctions in how different friction mechanisms operate, for example distinguish between mechanisms with high or low energy density. Wear mechanisms and/or sub-mechanisms frequently overlap and occur in a synergistic manner, producing a greater rate of wear than the sum of the individual wear mechanisms. Applying friccohesity for formulating reinforcing materials The friccohesity defines fine distribution of the similar particles into networking of dissimilar particles by weakening their own cohesion or cohesive forces and leading to establish a stronger binding with dissimilar particles noted as inter-particle binding.

Adhesive wearEdit

Adhesive wear can be found between surfaces during frictional contact and generally refers to unwanted displacement and attachment of wear debris and material compounds from one surface to another. Two separate mechanisms operate between the surfaces.


The embedded hydrogen bonding, functional groups, ionic arrays or pockets further generate extraordinary friccohesics and tentropy via intramolecular multiple force theory (IMMFT). Such science lays down a foundation of tentropicometry because the electronic arrays like Gd3+ with f7 electrons, Hg with full octet. The tentropicometry defines degree of intramolecular activities which develop varieties of arrays noted as portions or canonical areas of effect. Such science of molecules is expressed in solvents of varied polarity similar to the elution of the molecules due to solvent polarity. The said interacting coordinates structurally influence the fluid engineering of liquids which is noted as friccofluids because the molecular distribution on weakening of cohesive forces and strengthening of the intermolecular forces illustrate an overall behavior for developing advance molecular sciences. Therefore there is need to study and attain an understanding of the nature of the liquids through tentropicometry which is tracked by measuring friccohesity with survismeter. These sciences lead to formulate the quality of products because a liquid state facilitates a homogeneous distribution of ingredients, which could determine drug binding and release processes as the solvents gets extract molecules to be accommodated at a cost of energy and molecules motions. Friccohesicology could be an advance version of rheology because in friccohesicology both the frictional as well as cohesive forces work together to facilitate an integrated fluid flow or a fluid dynamics contrary to the rheology where only the frictional or the shear stress and strain are considered. The friccohesicology seems to take into account the surfaces of nanoparticle either capped with suitable capping agents or surrounded by hydrophilic layer of a normal micelle or hydrophobic layer of reverse micelles. Thus the friccohesicology could be determined with survismeter either repeating measurements of the same sample at variable temperature like 25, 30, 35, 40 degree Celsius or taking surfacatnt with increasing alkyl chain. 'Science is a open book we make it complicated for no reason.'

Higher is disruption of hydrogen bonding of solvent higher is friccohesity and the higher friccohesity predicts higher HB disruption. Therefore the friccohesity is structure modulating sensor (SMS) which also distinguishes the ionic, molecular, zwitterionic, and other interactions. The molecules remain mobile as the moderate binding forces and also their flexibility in sharing the molecular activities among themselves. For example, in aqueous NaCl, aqueous-glucose solutions the NaCl and glucose molecules both share their activities with water, and activities are expressed in terms of weakening of cohesive forces of NaCl and glucose to interaction with water contrary to the oil which does not share activities of the water. It could be implemented and explained through the micelles formation and spatial and geometrical shape of dendrimers which could attain virtual steric effects for channelizing the drugs and adsorbents or dispersants. The micelles are formed on tuning hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of surfactants in either aqueous medium or organic solvents like hexane, heptane and others. The surfactants at their specific concentration dissolved in aqueous medium forms normal micelles as the hydrophobicity gets saturated and hydrophilicity could engine much water or establish weak contact which could support motions of surfactants molecules aligning forming micelles. Actually viscosity measurements deals with intra and intermolecular networking of electronic forces materialized through electrostatic forces and the surface tension tracks damages of intramolecular forces or the molecular forces working within similar molecules through hydrogen bonding or others mechanism.

Friccohesity defines actual changes in cohesive forces and their reproduction in form of kinetic or frictional forces in liquid when the clustering of the nano-particles scatter in medium for making smaller cluster or aggregates of different nanometer levels. The friccohesity basically is originated out of similar and dissimilar dipolar vectorization in liquid states. Since similar dipoles like water, water dipole develop their own patterns of stabilization so are called similar vectors leading to have specific force of attraction among them at surface. Similarly, the dissimilar vectors do have another patterns of optimization so their expression different with similar forces noted as cohesive forces along with exohesive (extrovert)forces leading to have distribution.

  1. Adhesive wear is caused by relative motion, "direct contact" and plastic deformation which create wear debris and material transfer from one surface to another. In case of thermodynamic systems the friccohesity plays a master role and quantitatively explain a dissolution work to be undertaken or materialized by putting cohesive energy of solvent into distributing energy of mixtures allowing solute molecules to be distributed among the solvent phase with higher entropy. The solvent with higher cohesive forces gain higher potential energy and least entropy.
  2. Cohesive adhesive forces, holds two surfaces together even though they are separated by a measurable distance, with or without any actual transfer of material.

Thus the friccohesity seems to be congruent of cohesive and frictional forces. The interacting molecular structures that break the structure of solvent exchange the heat or the oscillations or the electron clouds on weakening cohesive force (CF) of solvent. However the solvent structure opposes the interaction of solute molecules to maintain its own structures. Thus the friction and triction both are developed. The triction depicts a thermodynamic restriction to break down or disrupt the solvent structure by solute interaction. Contrary to the triction the friction depicts a molecular force restriction. The thermodynamic disruption of solvent structure leads to develop intermolecular forces (IMF). Friccohesity of solute solvent interactions predicts a quantitative disruption of CF and formation of IMF in the same proportion. Thus the friccohesity is kinetic concept materialized through friction and triction both. Thus in solubilization or dispersion sciences the friccohesity predicts a level of solute and solvent interaction through molecular interaction engineering. Friccohesity becomes a most mobile theory to accommodate the geometrical spaces to support the electronic contact between the similar molecules with definite CF and dissimilar molecules or distributing force factor or friction to overcome opposing resistance. The friccohesity becomes a modern model to simulate not only the molecular contact but also successful exchange of the interacting activities in terms of activation energy, entropy, and Gibbs energy defined by triction.

The above description and distinction between "adhesive wear" and its counterpart "cohesive adhesive forces" are quite common. Usually cohesive surface forces and adhesive energy potentials between surfaces are examined as a special field in physics departments. The adhesive wear and material transfer due to direct contact and plastic deformation are examined in engineering science and in industrial research.

Two aligned surfaces may always cause material transfer and due to overlaps and symbiotic relations between relative motional "wear" and "chemical" cohesive attraction, the wear-categorization have been a source for discussion. Consequently, the definitions and nomenclature must evolve with the latest science and empiric observations.

Generally, adhesive wear occurs when two bodies slide over or are pressed into each other, which promote material transfer. This can be described as plastic deformation of very small fragments within the surface layers. The asperities or microscopic high points or surface roughness found on each surface, define the severity on how fragments of oxides are pulled off and adds to the other surface, partly due to strong adhesive forces between atoms[8] but also due to accumulation of energy in the plastic zone between the asperities during relative motion.

The outcome can be a growing roughening and creation of protrusions (i.e., lumps) above the original surface, in industrial manufacturing referred to as galling, which eventually breaches the oxidized surface layer and connects to the underlying bulk material which enhance the possibility for a stronger adhesion[9] and plastic flow around the lump.
The geometry and the nominal sliding velocity of the lump defines how the flowing material will be transported and accelerated around the lump which is critical to define contact pressure and developed temperature during sliding. The mathematical function for acceleration of flowing material is thereby defined by the lumps surface contour.

It's clear, given these prerequisites, that contact pressure and developed temperature is highly dependent on the lumps geometry.
Flow of material exhibits an increase in energy density, because initial phase transformation and displacement of material demand acceleration of material and high pressure.
Low pressure is not compatible with plastic flow, only after deceleration may the flowing material be exposed to low pressure and quickly cooled. In other words, you can't deform a solid material using direct contact without applying a high pressure and somewhere along the process must acceleration and deceleration take place, i.e., high pressure must be applied on all sides of the deformed material. Flowing material will immediately exhibit energy loss and reduced ability to flow due to phase transformation, if ejected from high pressure into low pressure. This ability withholds the high pressure and energy density in the contact zone and decreases the amount of energy or friction force needed for further advancement when the sliding continues and partly explain the difference between the static and sliding coefficient of friction (μ) if the main fracture mechanisms are equal to the previous. Thus stronger cohesion means that the molecules are not interacting and are somewhere deposited therefore a re-engineering is made where the molecules like cholesterol could be dissolved through adhesion. Thus the friccohesity mutually resolves the issues of deposition or dispersion both by estimating their mutual activities. For example if the molecules weaken their cohesion and cause adhesion or dispersion then both the cohesive and frictional forces become operational which are defined by the friccohesity. However, the tentropy of the individual molecules undergo changes as the interacting sites of the molecules gear up to accept the challenge of the new chemical environment. Thus the tentropy which is an entropy of individual molecules caused due to intramolecular chemical changes is of great significance. It also signifies the concept of the Intramolecular multiple force theory (IMMFT). Adhesive wear is a common fault factor in industrial applications such as sheet metal forming (SMF) and commonly encountered in conjunction with lubricant failures and are often referred to as welding wear or galling due to the exhibited surface characteristics, phase transition and plastic flow followed by cooling.
The type of mechanism and the amplitude of surface attraction, varies between different materials but are amplified by an increase in the density of "surface energy". Most solids will adhere on contact to some extent. However, oxidation films, lubricants and contaminants naturally occurring generally suppress adhesion.[10] and spontaneous exothermic chemical reactions between surfaces generally produce a substance with low energy status in the absorbed species.[9] Tentropy is a most significant in case of working molecules which are brought in contact of nanoemulsion. The catalysts, drugs, photosensitive, heat sensitive molecules which initiate intramolecular activities by developing varieties of arrays of electronic spin, vibrational motions, stretching motions, within infinitesimal changes. These activities cause several orders of activities and array of each becomes environment for another activity. Thus the system as well as environment are created within the single molecule. Therefore the tentropy becomes most popular in case of supramolecules, dendrimers where each tier has its own chemical environment with definite chemical activity. Complexes, capped nanoparticles are another prominent areas which need tentropy as the best solution for understanding their activities. The molecules keep interacting with other molecules based on compatibility and geometrical activities to align to substantially effective distance noted noted as equilibrium distance. These interacting activities could be enhanced by chemical additives like surfactants, binding charge inducers, catalyst for desired linkage. The fractionated charges through electronegativity causing positive and negative poles induce Coulombic forces. The functional groups the pole flickering activity like peptide bond in protein. These lead to increase cohesive forces or distribution activities.The weakening of cohesive forces and strengthening of distributed against medium restriction are defined by friccohesity. Selection rule for reactions constrain possible transitions from one quantum state to another. so the selection rules are derived for electromagnetic transitions in molecules, in atoms, in atomic nuclei. The selection rule may differ according to technique used to observe the transition. Selection rule plays a role in chemical reactions as some reactions are spin forbidden reactions. Ultimately it is atomic orbital which matters a lot for making molecular orbital. Thereby such intramolecular atomic orbitals constitute a concept of tentropy. As each atomic orbital acts as a set or array of one order while another atomic orbital with different of atomic orbital energy acts as another set or array or canonical or partitioning box. The intramolecular entropy is noted as tentropy where one set or array with different energy may act as source or another set or array with another energy values may act as sink where energy could be exchanged mutually causing certain disorder. So the reactions where spin states change at least once from reactants to products are noted as spin forbidden. In quantum mechanics a basis for a spectroscopic selection rule is value of transition moment integral.The friccohesity has resolved several sciences for better estimation of solute distribution science in specified medium."Front runners make history however they suffer for a principled stand and those who are manipulative are rejected by the history.Their influence remains till they hold power"

Abrasive wearEdit

Abrasive wear occurs when a hard rough surface slides across a softer surface.[8] ASTM International (formerly American Society for Testing and Materials) defines it as the loss of material due to hard particles or hard protuberances that are forced against and move along a solid surface.[11]

Abrasive wear is commonly classified according to the type of contact and the contact environment.[12] The type of contact determines the mode of abrasive wear. The two modes of abrasive wear are known as two-body and three-body abrasive wear. Two-body wear occurs when the grits or hard particles remove material from the opposite surface. The common analogy is that of material being removed or displaced by a cutting or plowing operation. Three-body wear occurs when the particles are not constrained, and are free to roll and slide down a surface. The contact environment determines whether the wear is classified as open or closed. An open contact environment occurs when the surfaces are sufficiently displaced to be independent of one another

There are a number of factors which influence abrasive wear and hence the manner of material removal. Several different mechanisms have been proposed to describe the manner in which the material is removed. Three commonly identified mechanisms of abrasive wear are:

  1. Plowing
  2. Cutting
  3. Fragmentation

Plowing occurs when material is displaced to the side, away from the wear particles, resulting in the formation of grooves that do not involve direct material removal. The displaced material forms ridges adjacent to grooves, which may be removed by subsequent passage of abrasive particles. Cutting occurs when material is separated from the surface in the form of primary debris, or microchips, with little or no material displaced to the sides of the grooves. This mechanism closely resembles conventional machining. Fragmentation occurs when material is separated from a surface by a cutting process and the indenting abrasive causes localized fracture of the wear material. These cracks then freely propagate locally around the wear groove, resulting in additional material removal by spalling.[12]

Abrasive wear can be measured as loss of mass by the Taber Abrasion Test according to ISO 9352 or ASTM D 4060.

Surface fatigueEdit

Surface fatigue is a process by which the surface of a material is weakened by cyclic loading, which is one type of general material fatigue. Fatigue wear is produced when the wear particles are detached by cyclic crack growth of microcracks on the surface. These microcracks are either superficial cracks or subsurface cracks.

Fretting wearEdit

Fretting wear is the repeated cyclical rubbing between two surfaces. Over a period of time fretting which will remove material from one or both surfaces in contact. It occurs typically in bearings, although most bearings have their surfaces hardened to resist the problem. Another problem occurs when cracks in either surface are created, known as fretting fatigue. It is the more serious of the two phenomena because it can lead to catastrophic failure of the bearing. An associated problem occurs when the small particles removed by wear are oxidised in air. The oxides are usually harder than the underlying metal, so wear accelerates as the harder particles abrade the metal surfaces further. Fretting corrosion acts in the same way, especially when water is present. Unprotected bearings on large structures like bridges can suffer serious degradation in behaviour, especially when salt is used the during winter to deice the highways carried by the bridges. The problem of fretting corrosion was involved in the Silver Bridge tragedy and the Mianus River Bridge accident.

Erosive wearEdit

Erosive wear can be defined as an extremely short sliding motion and is executed within a short time interval. Erosive wear is caused by the impact of particles of solid or liquid against the surface of an object.[10] The impacting particles gradually remove material from the surface through repeated deformations and cutting actions.[13] It is a widely encountered mechanism in industry. Due to the nature of the conveying process, piping systems are prone to wear when abrasive particles have to be transported.[14]

The rate of erosive wear is dependent upon a number of factors. The material characteristics of the particles, such as their shape, hardness, impact velocity and impingement angle are primary factors along with the properties of the surface being eroded. The impingement angle is one of the most important factors and is widely recognized in literature.[15] For ductile materials the maximum wear rate is found when the impingement angle is approximately 30°, whilst for non ductile materials the maximum wear rate occurs when the impingement angle is normal to the surface.[15]

Corrosion and oxidation wearEdit

This kind of wear occur in a variety of situations both in lubricated and unlubricated contacts. The fundamental cause of these forms of wear is chemical reaction between the worn material and the corroding medium.[16] This kind of wear is a mixture of corrosion, wear and the synergistic term of corrosion-wear which is also called tribocorrosion.

Testing and EvaluationEdit

Several standard test methods exist for different types of wear to determine the amount of material removal during a specified time period under well-defined conditions.
The ASTM International Committee G-2 attempts to standardise wear testing for specific applications, which are periodically updated. The Society for Tribology and Lubrication Engineers (STLE) has documented a large number of frictional wear and lubrication tests. But all test methods have inbuilt limitations and do not give a true picture in every aspect.
This can be attributed to the complex nature of wear, in particular "industrial wear", and the difficulties associated with accurately simulating wear processes.(ref4) An attrition test is a test is carried out to measure the resistance of a granular material to wear.

A standard result review for wear tests, defined by the ASTM International and respective subcommittees such as Committee G-2, should be expressed as loss of material during wear in terms of volume. The volume loss gives a truer picture than weight loss, particularly when comparing the wear resistance properties of materials with large differences in density.
For example, a weight loss of 14 g in a sample of tungsten carbide + cobalt (density = 14000 kg/m³) and a weight loss of 2.7 g in a similar sample of aluminium alloy (density = 2700 kg/m³) both result in the same level of wear (1 cm³) when expressed as a volume loss. The inverse of volume loss can be used as a comparable index of wear resistance.
Standard wear tests are only used for comparative material ranking of a specific test parameter as stipulated in the test method. For more realistic values of material deterioration in industrial applications it is necessary to conduct wear testing under conditions simulating the exact wear process.(ref4)

The working life of an engineering component is expired when dimensional losses exceed the specified tolerance limits. Wear, along with other ageing processes such as fatigue and creep in association with stress concentration factors such as fracture toughness causes materials to progressively degrade, eventually leading to material failure at an advanced age.
Wear in industrial applications is one of a limited number of fault factors in which an object loses its usefulness and the economic implication can be of enormous value to the industry.(ref 4)

The Archard Equation is the classic wear prediction model - see Bisson[17]

Lubricant analysis is an alternative way of measuirng wear to components indirectly by testing the lubricant for presence of wear particles. These can be analysed by element by XRF or ICP-OES or structurally by Ferrography or other microscopic analysis. [18].

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ Akchurin, Aydar; Bosman, Rob; Lugt, Piet M.; Drogen, Mark van (2016-06-16). "Analysis of Wear Particles Formed in Boundary-Lubricated Sliding Contacts". Tribology Letters. 63 (2): 16. doi:10.1007/s11249-016-0701-z. ISSN 1023-8883. 
  2. ^ Davis, J.R., ed. (1998). Metals Handbook: Desk Edition. ASM International. 
  3. ^ a b Varenberg, M. (2013). "Towards a unified classification of wear". Friction. 1 (4): 333–340. doi:10.1007/s40544-013-0027-x. 
  4. ^ Chattopadhyay, R. (2001). Surface Wear - Analysis, Treatment, and Prevention. OH, USA: ASM-International. ISBN 0-87170-702-0. 
  5. ^ Chattopadhyay, R. (2004). Advanced Thermally Assisted Surface Engineering Processes. MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 1-4020-7696-7. 
  6. ^ Jones, M., H., and D. Scott, Eds. (1983). Industrial Tribology: the practical aspects of friction, lubrication, and wear. New York, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
  7. ^ Williams, J. A. (2005). "Wear and wear particles - Some fundamentals." Tribology International 38(10): 863-870
  8. ^ a b Rabinowicz, E. (1995). Friction and Wear of Materials. New York, John Wiley and Sons.
  9. ^ a b Glaeser, W. A., Ed. (1993).
  10. ^ a b Stachowiak, G. W., and A. W. Batchelor (2005). Engineering Tribology. Burlington, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann
  11. ^ Standard Terminology Relating to Wear and Erosion, Annual Book of Standards, Vol 03.02, ASTM, 1987, p 243-250
  12. ^ a b ASM Handbook Committee (2002). ASM Handbook. Friction, Lubrication and Wear Technology. U.S.A., ASM International. Volume 18.
  13. ^ Mamata, K. P. (2008). "A review on silt erosion in hydro turbines." Renewable & sustainable energy reviews 12(7): 1974.
  14. ^ CAR, Duarte; FJ, de Souza; VF, dos Santos (January 2016). "Mitigating elbow erosion with a vortex chamber". Powder Technology. 288: 6–25. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2015.10.032. 
  15. ^ a b Sinmazcelik, T. and I. Taskiran (2007). "Erosive wear behaviour of polyphenylenesulphide (PPS) composites." Materials in engineering 28(9): 2471-2477.
  16. ^ Stachwaik, Gwidon W.; Batchelor, Andrew W. (2005). Engineering tribology (3rd ed.). Elsevier Inc. 
  17. ^ Bisson, Edmond E. (1968). Various Modes of Wear and their Controlling Factors. NASA Technical Memorendum TM X-52426. 
  18. ^ "Lubrication theory in oil analysis| Learn Oil Analysis". Retrieved 2017-11-30. 

General referencesEdit

  • S.C. Lim. Recent Development in Wear Mechanism Maps. Trib. Intl. 1998;31; 87-97
  • H.C. Meng and K. C Ludema. Wear 1995; 183; 443-457
  • R. Bosman and D. J. Schipper. Wear 2012; 280;54-62
  • M. W. Akram, K. Polychronopoulou, A. A. Polycarpou. Trib. Int. : 2013;57;92-100

Further readingEdit

  • Bowden, Tabor: Friction and Lubrication of Solids (Oxford:Clarendon Press 1950)
  • Kleis I. and Kulu P.: Solid Particle Erosion. Springer-Verlag, London, 2008, 206 pp.
  • Zum Gahr K.-H.: Microstructure and wear of materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987, 560 S.
  • Jones J.R.:Lubrication, Friction, and Wear, NASA-SP-8063, 1971, 75 pp. A nice, free and good document available here.