A tag has been placed on Zack smeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ɥʞoɹoɯoʞS 13:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Chloe casero
edit A tag has been placed on Chloe casero requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 13:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Creation of inappropriate pages
edit
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Margaret k, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 13:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Chloe casero
edit A tag has been placed on Chloe casero requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ɥʞoɹoɯoʞS 13:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Niagara Falls. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 13:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Your edit added information that was already in the article and it also removed the entire History section from the article. It was also extremely poorly written, lacking any capitalization or punctuation and containing a number of very basic grammatical errors. It was highly disruptive. Please take a great deal more care in editing in the future. Gwernol 13:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bed, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bed was changed by Zyrus20 (u) (t) deleting 8560 characters on 2008-06-11T13:26:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
editYou latest edit to Bed was a personal attack on me. It was also vandalism since it removed a large chunk of the article and was clearly nothing to do with the subject of the article. If you have a problem with me, address it on my talk page not by vandalizing articles. If you continue to vandalize articles, your next block will be for substantially longer. Grammar and spelling are very important. If you were really pursuing a Masters degree in Literacy, you would know this. Even if your edits were composed correctly, it is highly inappropriate to replace an entire section of an article with one line of text that is already covered elsewhere in the article. When your block expires, please reconsider your approach to Wikipedia editing. Thanks, Gwernol 15:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
