Zonedar
Hi, thanks for pointing that out to me - I've self-rved now... I should have got back to the anon sooner but got distracted with other junk :(--Nilfanion (talk) 22:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks a Bunch!!! Zonedar 23:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Re:Talk pages edit
I encourage you to look at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. It clearly states here that it's appropriate to remove comments if they are irrelevant to improving the article. The section that I removed has nothing to do with improving the article, it is simply a (now blocked) user asking how to smuggle endangered species corpses into the civilized world. That is illegal and there is no way that information is going in the article. We don't have a Wikipedia article about how to rob a bank. Dtm142 02:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- And that has what to do with the article attached to the page? Wikipedia is not a how to. Dtm142 20:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
SCI page edit
Good call on removing those HSUS references. I didn't even notice them I was so focused on the new additions. This whole SCI page could use review, particularly the references. I've left a couple of notes on discussion and no one ever replies. In all, I think there should be a section about endangered species, but two sets of bad references don't make one good one! Thanks Bob98133 (talk) 22:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
"Conservation" edit
Please stop attempting to insert your point of view into the hunting article. Just because you think that hunters have tried to conserve animals doesn't mean it's true. Killing animals is not conservation. I saw from your user page that you enjoy hunting. I think it's cruel and pointless to kill things for recreation. There are two points of view. They should both be displayed so that the world isn't decieved into thinking that shooting things and nailing their heads to your wall is conservation. And PS- which one of us is really POV pushing here? Think on that. Ronald Wenonah (talk) 14:38, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
The fact that I enjoy hunting does not mean that your edits were not completely POV and entirety uncited as evidenced by the removal of your changes by other editors and the comments on the Hunting talk page. Think on that... Zonedar (talk) 21:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Women's Health Information Edit-a-thon: Tuesday, May 12 at OHSU edit
You are invited!
- Tuesday, May 12, 2015: Wikipedia Women's Health Information Edit-a-thon – 1 to 4pm
- Wikipedia Edit-a-thon hosted by OHSU's Center for Women's Health in honor of National Women's Health Week
- Location: Biomedical Information Communications Center (3280 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239)
- This edit-a-thon is intended to address some of these important differences and to generally improve women’s health information in key articles and topics. Areas for improvement have been identified in cooperation with WikiProject Medicine. Prior Wikipedia editing is not required; assistance will be available the day of the event. Attendees should bring their own laptops and power cords.
Hope you can make it! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please post to the event page.
Thanks,
To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list.
Orphaned non-free image File:Scilogo.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Scilogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 15 September 2019 (UTC)